Commissioner Ofincome Tax-Iii v. S. Chand and Company Ltd.,

O R D E R %

15.11.2016

There is a delay of 1152 days in the filing and refilling of this appeal. It is not explained adequately; the revenue says that the reorganization of its counsel's panel twice and the unusual pendency of cases were reasons for its not filing the appeal in time. Neither of these can be called sufficient cause persuading the Court to condone the delay. The appeal and the pending applications are accordingly dismissed.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

NAJMI WAZIRI, J NOVEMBER 15, 2016/ajk

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 720/2016, C.M. APPL.39117/2016 + ITA 722/2016, C.M. APPL.39119-39120/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Versus S. CHAND AND COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Sanjay Kumar and Sh. Dileep Shivpuri, Standing Counsel, for revenue, in Item Nos. 4 and 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI