- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 77/2015
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.10.2016
¶1Although this is an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 ('Act') learned counsel for the parties agree that a sole arbitrator can be appointed by this Court for adjudication of disputes between the parties.
¶2The Court accordingly appoints Justice Anil Kumar, a former Judge of this Court, as a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties including their claims and counter-claims. The learned Arbitrator shall fix his own terms and fees. He is requested to make a disclosure in terms of Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Act before commencing the arbitral proceedings.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 77/2015
¶3The parties are directed to appear before the learned Arbitrator on 22nd November 2016 at 4 pm at a venue will be fixed by the Petitioner and communicated to the learned Arbitrator one week in advance. The expenses thereof will be shared equally by the parties. If the said date and time are not convenient, the learned Arbitrator will communicate to the parties the changed date and time at least three days in advance.
¶4The interim order passed by this Court on 30th December 2015 is directed to continue, subject to the bank guarantee kept alive by the Petitioner, till such the learned Arbitrator varies or modifies the said order in accordance with law in an application that may be filed by either party under Section 17 of the Act. Such application be filed not later than prior to the first hearing. The learned Arbitrator will in that event endeavour to dispose of such application within a period of four weeks from the date of the first hearing in the arbitral proceedings.
¶5The petition is disposed of in the above terms. A copy of this order be communicated to the learned Arbitrator as well as Additional Coordinator, DAC forthwith.
¶6Order be given dasti.
S.MURALIDHAR, J OCTOBER 27, 2016 Rm
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 77/2015
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 77/2015 ETA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate. versus IJM (INDIA) INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shanshu Sharan with Mr. Y. Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.