VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
7 January 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 58/2024

Judgment

ORDER

08.01.2024

Heard Mr. D. Medhi, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶2This application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is preferred by accused, namely, Rajesh Kumar, who has Page No.# 2/3 been languishing in jail hazot in connection with the Satgaon P.S. Case No. 231/2023, under Sections 406/420 of the IPC read with Section 66[D] of the IT Act, for granting bail.

¶3The aforementioned case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by one Dr. Bandana Baruah, on 17.12.2023. The essence of allegations made in the FIR is that on 17.12.2023, during EMRS Examination held at Army Public School, Narangi Exam Centre, one candidate namely, Rajesh Kumar of Haryana was caught red handed by invigilator while using electronic devices i.e. Bluetooth, SIM Card and Dongle etc.

¶4Mr. Medhi, learned counsel for the accused submits that the accused was arrested on 17.12.2023, and since then he has been languishing in jail hazot for last 18 days and that he is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency and therefore, it is contended to allow the petition.

¶5On the other hand, Mr. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the petition by contending that there are sufficient materials in the record to show his complicity with the offence alleged.

¶6Having heard the submission of learned Advocates for both sides, I have carefully gone through the petition and the materials placed on record.

¶7It appears that the accused was arrested on 17.12.2023, and since then he has been languishing in the jail hajot for last 18 days. If further appears that the IO got sufficient time for investigation.

¶8Balancing the period of detention with the nature of accusation and the punishment prescribed for the same, this Court is inclined to allow the petition.

¶9Accordingly, it is provided that on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- Page No.# 3/3 only, with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup [M] at Guwahati, the accused be enlarged on bail.

¶10In terms of above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010001572024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./58/2024 RAJESH KUMAR S/O PAHAB SINGH R/O DE-153, NAI BASTI (SALLAGARH) P.S. PALWAL DIST. PALWAL STATE- HARYANA PH-9577726468 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.