VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Md Hussain Ali and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
12 May 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
MACApp. 93/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010003232015 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oMACApp./93/2024o ORIENTALoINSURANCEoCOMPANYoLTDo HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToORIENTALoHOUSEoAo25/27oASAFoALIo ROAD,oNEWoDELHIo110002oANDoREGIONALoOFFICEoAToGUWAHATI-7,o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoREGIONALoMANAGER VERSUSo MDoHUSSAINoALIoandoANRo S/OoAKTARoALI,oVILL.oTARABARIoBORPAKA,oP.S.oRUPAHI,oDIST.oNAGAON,o ASSAM. AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oCoSHARMAo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkR o

13.05.2024 o Heard the learned senior counsel Mr. S. Dutta assisted by Mrs. M. Choudhury, learned counsel representing the appellant. Page No.# 2/3

¶2At the time of filing of this MAC Appeal, the appellant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of 507 days of delay in preferring the appeal. In that petition, notices upon the respondents were published in a newspaper and in spite of that the respondents did not contest that petition. Ultimately, the petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was allowed.

¶3Today, Mr. Dutta submits that in this case, no fresh notices are required to be issued to the respondents because it can be presumed that the respondents have knowledge about this case.

¶4After hearing Mr. Dutta and after considering the aforesaid facts, I have decided to agree with Mr. Dutta. No fresh notices are required to be issued to the respondents.

¶5On 17.04.2003 at about 8.30 A.M. while Md. Hussain Ali was standing on the left side of the road, he was hit by a vehicle bearing Registration No.AS-01/J-4477. Because of the said incident, Md. Hussain Ali became permanently disabled. Therefore, he filed an application seeking compensation.

¶6In order to prove his case, Md. Hussain Ali relied upon a Cover Note No.100741 to saddle the Oriental Insurance Company Limited with the liability to indemnify the owner.

¶7In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Musstt. Hazira Bibi, 2008 SCC OnLine Gau 182, this Court has clarified the liability of the Insurance Company, which reads as under: "7. It is trite that an insurer merely indemnifies the owner of a vehicle, who may be liable to pay compensation. The primary liability for paying compensation is, thus, on the owner of the offending vehicle and the insurer is merely an indemnifier. Without proof of the fact as whether a person is or is not an insurer, such a person cannot be saddled with the liability to indemnify the owner."

¶8In a case before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Tribunal has to determine the question as to whether the offending vehicle stood insured under an Insurance Company. In the case in hand, Md. Hussain Ali did not file any Insurance Page No.# 3/3 Policy. He only relied upon a Cover Note of Oriental Insurance Company Limited. Such a Cover Note does not prove that a particular vehicle was insured under an Insurance Company.

¶9Here, in this case, the Tribunal did not frame an issue as to whether the offending vehicle bearing Registration No.AS-01/J-4477 was insured under the Oriental Insurance Company Limited?.

¶10This Court is of the opinion that the impugned judgment dated 09.10.2013 passed by the MACT, Nagaon, Assam is a defective one and therefore, not sustainable in law. The impugned judgment of the Tribunal is set aside.

¶11The appeal is allowed. The case is remanded to the MACT, Nagaon for framing an issue as to "whether the offending vehicle bearing Registration No.AS-01/J-4477 was insured under the Oriental Insurance Company Limited"? The Tribunal shall provide opportunity to both sides to prove or disprove this issue. Thereafter, the Tribunal shall pass a fresh judgment on all the issues including the issues which were already framed in this case.

The MAC Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.