- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 February 2023
- Bench
- Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- WP(C) 716/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15.02.2023 (A.M. Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Ms. D. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. J. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, being the Union of India. Also heard Mr. G. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2, 6 and 7, being the authorities in the Home Department; Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, being the Election Commission of India; Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4, being the Assam State Co-ordinator of NRC Page No.# 3/4 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5, being the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta.
¶2The petitioner Mamiran Nessa, daughter of late Ibrahim Ali, wife of Ramjan Ali of village Mairajar Pathar, PS Barpeta Road in the Barpeta district was referred to the Foreigners' Tribunal No. 9 at Barpeta for an opinion as to whether she is a person who had entered the State of Assam subsequent to
25.03.1971 and accordingly, F.T. 9th (BPT) Case No. 651/2018 corresponding to S.P. Ref. IM(D)T Case No. 6911/98 was registered against the petitioner. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner took the stand that she is the daughter of Ibrahim Ali son of Afsar where the name of Ibrahim Ali appears at Sl. No. 418 of the voters' list of 1965 of village Bilashipara, Mouza Gobardhana, Sub-Division Barpeta (Sadar). The petitioner also refers to the kabin nama as regards her marriage wherein the name of the bride is Mamiran Nessa daughter of Ibrahim Ali, resident of Bilashipara.
¶3If the name of Ibrahim Ali of village Bilashipara appears in the voters' list of 1965 and as per the information contained in the kabin nama the petitioner is the daughter of Ibrahim Ali of village Bilashipara, prima facie it is established that the petitioner would be a citizen of India and not a person who entered the State of Assam subsequent to 25.03.1971.
¶4Accordingly, the matter is remanded back to the Foreigners' Tribunal No. 9 at Barpeta to examine the aforesaid aspect and pass a reasoned order thereon. If the reasoned order to be passed is in favour of the petitioner, same shall prevail over the earlier opinion dated 27.01.2022 in F.T. 9th (BPT) Case No. 651/2018 corresponding to S.P. Ref. IM(D)T Case No. 6911/98 and on the other hand, if the reasoned order to be passed is against the petitioner, implications under the law would follow. The petitioner to appear before the Tribunal on Page No.# 4/4
22.03.2023. If for the purpose the petitioner desires to produce any further material, the petitioner would be at liberty to do so. On the other hand, if the State authorities are of the view that the petitioner Mamiran Nessa daughter of Ibrahim Ali of village Bilashipara and Ibrahim Ali of the voters' list of 1965 also of village Bilashipara are two different persons, the State authorities would be at liberty to bring in their evidence to controvert materials that the petitioner may produce. No coercive action be taken against the petitioner till the reasoned order of the Tribunal is passed. Writ petition stands disposed of as indicated above.
J U D G E J U D G E Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010004452023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/716/2023o MAMIRANoNESSAo D/O-oLATEoIBRAHIMoALI,o W/O-oRAMJANoALIo,o R/O-oVILLAGEoMAIRAJARoPATHAR,o P.S-oBARPETAoROAD,o DIST-oBARPETA,oASSAM, VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo6oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoMINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oGOVT.oOF INDIA,oSASTRIoBHAWAN,oNEWoDELHI-o110001. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6 3:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oREP.oBYoTHEoCHIEFoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNIRVACHANoSADAN oASHOKAoROAD NEWoDELHI-110001 4:THEoSTATEoCOORDINATOR oNATIONALoREGISTERoOFoCITIZENS oASSAM o1SToFLOOR oACHYUToPLAZA oG.SoROAD. oBHANGAGARH Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI-05 DIST- KAMRUP (M) 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O AND DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) BARPETA P.O AND DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE BARPETA ROAD POLICE STATION P.O -BARPETA ROAD DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D GHOSH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.