VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Md Mohor Ali v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
27 January 2023
Bench
Manish Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 95/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 27-01-2023 Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State of Assam.

¶2By this application under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, Page No.# 2/4 1973, the accused-petitioner viz. Md. Mohor Ali has prayed for his release on bail in connection with Kachugaon Police Station Case no. 33/2022, registered for offences under Sections 120B/341/325/326/328/307/379, Indian Penal Code [IPC].

¶3The accused-petitioner was arrested and produced before the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate [M], Gossaigaon on 30.11.2022. On being so produced, the accused-petitioner was remanded to custody.

¶4As per the First Information Report [FIR], lodged on 29.09.2022, the informant, who was a driver of a truck bearing registration no. UP-14/ET-9761, was travelling from Delhi to Guwahati carrying goods of two parties. The consignments were to be delivered at Tezpur. At around 09-00/09-30 p.m. on

24.09.2022, the truck was way-laid by a ten-wheeler truck near Kokrajhar and around 7-8 people came out from the truck. The informant was taken forcefully by them inside their vehicle and thereafter, his hands were tied and eyes were covered by a piece of cloth. The informant was intoxicated and was beaten badly. The informant was thereafter, disrobed and thrown into a dense forest. The miscreants ran away with the vehicle leaving the informant naked inside the jungle. The mobile phone and the money in the possession of the informant were also snatched away. On regaining consciousness, the informant found himself in a hospital. Later on, the truck bearing registration no. UP-14/ET-9761 was recovered in empty condition at Ghograpar.

¶5Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor who has received the case diary, has submitted that the arrested co-accused persons in their statements recorded under Section 161, CrPC have clearly implicated the present accused-petitioner in the incident alleged in the FIR. The injury report of the victim reported multiple injuries in the nature of abrasion in different Page No.# 3/4 parts of the body and pain and swelling in the lower leg. The injuries are reported to be grievous in nature, caused by blunt objects. On query to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, he has submitted that apart from the afore-mentioned offences, no other offence has been added to the crime case by the Investigating Officer having regard to the materials, collected during the course of investigation.

¶6Considering the above fact situation obtaining in the case and having regard to the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody for 57 days since

30.11.2022, this Court is of the view that the further custodial detention of the accused-petitioner appears not necessary for the purpose of carrying out further investigation into the case and if he is released on bail, at this stage of investigation, such release is not likely to bring any adverse effect in the further investigation of the case, provided he continues to extend his assistance and co-operation in the further investigation of the case.

¶7Accordingly, it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate [M], Gossaigaon, subject to the conditions that :- [i] the accused-petitioner appear before the Investigating Officer of the case on the 1st day and 15th day of the month for the next 2 [two] months and shall cooperate with the investigation and shall thereafter, make himself available as and when his presence is required by the I.O. in the investigation of the case; [ii] the accused-petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts Page No.# 4/4 of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; [iii] the accused-petitioner shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; [iv] the accused-petitioner shall maintain law and order and he shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or of the commission of which he is suspected; and [v] the accused-petitioner shall regularly remain present during the trial and cooperate the Court to complete the trial for the above offences, if charge-sheeted in the case.

¶8The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010004932023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./95/2023 MD MOHOR ALI S/O- LATE SOFOR ALI, VILLAGE NO-1, JOYMA, P.S- GOSSAIGAON, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.