- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 7 August 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- Crl.A. 69/2010
Judgment
ORDER 08-08-2024 Heard Mr. M Smith, learned counsel for the appellant and M. K P Pathak, learned Amicus Curiae for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. During the deliberation of the matter, it is seen that the appellant inadvertently preferred this criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2010 passed by the learned Special Page No.# 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, Assam, Guwahati in Case No. CR 1861/2006, whereby the respondents/accused were discharged under Section 245 (1) CrPC where the proceeding against them was initiated by the Employees State Insurance Company, instead of preferring a criminal revision petition. Mr. Smith, learned counsel for the appellant prays for some time to approach the appropriate forum for filing necessary application. Prayer is allowed. With the above observation, this criminal appeal stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010005142010 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./69/2010 EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, REGIONAL OFFICE , BAMUNIMAIDAN, GUWAHATI-21 VERSUS MR. SATYENDRA BORAH and 2 ORS, M/S BORAH SECURITY AND PLACEMENT SERVICE P LTD. NEAR DON BOSCO SCHOOL, TEZPUR. 2:M/S BORAH SECURITY AND PLACEMENT SERVICE P LTD. NEAR DON BOSCO SCHOOL TEZPUR. 3:THE STATE OF ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K K NANDI, MS.P BORGOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K P PATHAK(AMICUS CURIAE FOR R-1,2), PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.