VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Satish Tiwari and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 January 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 122/2024

Judgment

ORDER

23.01.2024 Heard Mr T Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioners, 1) Satish Tiwari, and 2) Abdul Hakim. Page No.# 2/3

¶2The petitioners have filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for pre-arrest bail, as they are apprehending arrest in connection with Khetri PS Case No. 202/2023, under Sections 379/411/34 IPC, read with Sections 11 (1) (a) (d) (e) of the of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, read with Sections 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

¶3Heard Mr R R Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

¶4I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.

¶5I have also perused the Case Diary.

¶6It is submitted at the Bar that the petitioner No. 1 is the owner of the vehicle bearing Registration No. NL-02-Q-5257 and the petitioner No. 2 is the owner of the cattle.

¶7It is submitted that the petitioner No. 2 is the legitimate owner of the cattle and Annexure-2 series reflects the receipts relating to purchasing of cattle from JRD Market under Morigaon Zilla Parishad.

¶8It is also submitted that the petitioner No. 1, who is the owner of the vehicle was not privy to the allegation that the cattle transported through his vehicle were stolen cattle.

¶9The contents of the Case Diary are not brought to the fore. However, the Case Page No.# 3/3 Diary reveals that investigation has progressed to a considerable extent.

¶10The petitioners are local residents and they have pledged to cooperate with the investigation.

¶11It appears that custodial interrogation of the petitioners may not be required for the progress or conclusion of investigation.

¶12Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. In the event of their arrest, the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/-each with a suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority under the conditions that:-

i) the petitioners shall appear before the IO within 10 (ten) days and cooperate with the investigation,

ii) the petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged, and

iii) the petitioners shall not jump the bail. On breach of any bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.

¶13Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶14Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010005802024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/122/2024 SATISH TIWARI AND ANR S/O- NABARDESHWA TIWARI, R/O- VILLAGE WARD NO-1, NAHARKATIYA TOWN, P.S- NAHARKATIYA, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 2: ABDUL HAKIM S/O- AHAMAD ALI R/O- VILLAGE MOHGHULI BORGOLA P.S- LAKHIMPUR DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.