VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Harendra Nath Borah v. The State of Assam

Closed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 August 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
Crl.Rev.P. 210/2011

Judgment

ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.

¶2The learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh by judgment and order dated

17.03.2010, passed in Sessions Case No. 02/2006 arising out of Tingkhong P.S. Case No. 154/2004 convicted the petitioner under Section 376(f) IPC and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 (three) years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo R.I. for 6 (six) months.

¶3Aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh being Crl. A. No. 7(2)/2010. The learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh after hearing Page No.# 2/2 the learned counsel for the parties by judgment and order dated 07.03.2011 dismissed the said appeal of the petitioner and uphold the order dated 17.03.2010 passed in Sessions Case No. 02/2006 by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh.

¶4Thereafter, the petitioner filed this criminal revision petition on 07.06.2011 challenging the judgment and order dated 17.03.2010 passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Sessions Case No. 02/2006 as well as the judgment and order dated 07.03.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in Crl. A. No. 7(2)/2010 respectively.

¶5By order dated 13.06.2011, passed earlier in Crl. Misc. Case No. 416/2011, the Court suspended the impugned sentence imposed upon the petitioner by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh by judgment and order dated 17.03.2010, passed in Sessions Case No. 02/2006, till disposal of this criminal revision petition.

¶6During the deliberation of the matter, Mr. Saikia, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner in the meanwhile, expired as being informed to him by the family members of the petitioner.

¶7It is also seen that at the time of filing of this revision petition, the petitioner was above 63 years in June, 2011.

¶8In view of the above, this criminal revision petition stands closed due to abatement.

¶9Registry shall return the records of Sessions Case No. 2/2006 to the Court of learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh as well as the records of Crl. A. No. 7(2)/2010 to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh along with copies of this order.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010006262011 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./210/2011 HARENDRA NATH BORAH S/O LT. PHANIDHAR BORA R/O 2 NO. DHAMANGAON, P.O. DHAMAN, P.S. TINGKHONG, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS M ABDULLAH P, MR.D SAIKIA,MR.S M MOLLAH Advocate for the Respondent : , PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.