- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 February 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- AB 111/2024
Judgment
ORDER 16-02-2024 Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Addl. PP, Assam. This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Cr.PC, in respect of south Salmara PS Case No. 361/2023 under Sections 419/420/406/409 IPC. Pursuant to the interim order granted by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement has already been recorded. Page No.# 2/2 I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer, he do not deserve to be detained in custody therefore his pre-arrest bail application stands allowed. The interim bail granting on 12.01.2024 is made absolute. The petitioner is directed that he shall cooperate with the investigation as and when required. With the aforesaid observation, the bail petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010006742024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/111/2024 RIAJUL ISLAM @ RIAJUL HOQUE S/O LATE NAYAN UDDIN VILL- PATAKATA P.S. SOUTH SALMARA DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, PIN-783127 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.