Varinder Kumar v. Union of India and Ors

ORDER Date : 09.02.2024

Heard Mr. I. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. R. Adhikari, learned CGC, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.

Mr. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the writ petitioner had already retired from his services on reaching the age of superannuation around 10 years ago and as such, the issues arising in this writ petition has since become infructuous.

In view of the submission as made above by Mr. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner; the instant writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010006862012 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3340/2012o VARINDERoKUMARo SONoOFoLATEoOMoPRAKASHoNO.o911680319,oINSPECTORoGDoG.C.oCRPF,o IMPHAL,oPERMANENToRESIDENToOFoHOUSEoNO.o13424,oLANEoNO.o1oNEARo MAHABIRoMANDIRoTHAKURoCOLONYoDIST.oBHATINDA,oSTATE-oPUNJAB,o PINoNO.o151005. VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoandoORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFoHOME,o NEWoDELHI-110001. 2:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oCENTRALoRESERVEoPOLICEoFORCE oNEWoDELHI-o110001. 3:THEoINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICEoCRPF oMoandoNoSECTOR oIMPHALoMANIPUR. 4:THEoDEPUTYoINSPECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oGROUPoCENTREoCRPF oIMPHALoMANIPUR. 5:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMANDANT oSPECIALISToMEDICALoOFFICER oGRADE-II oJUNIORoS.M.O.oCOMPOSITEoHOSPITALoCRPF oGUWAHATI-23o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.ToUoSK.o AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oC.G.C.oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR