- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 January 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 137/2024
Judgment
ORDER
12.01.2024 Heard T Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioners, 1) Md Karim Ali, 2) Md Ikramul Ali, 3) Md Riajul Islam and 4) Md Abu Taleb.
¶2The petitioners have filed this application under Section 439 CrPC, with prayer for bail, as they are behind bars since 17.12.2023, in connection with Sonapur PS Case No. 275/2023, registered under Sections 379/411/34 IPC, read with Section 11 (1) (a) (b) (d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and Section 13 (1)/14 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.
¶3Heard Mr R R Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are languishing in jail since
17.12.2023. They were not aware that the cattle was being smuggled through the vehicle. The petitioner No. 1 is the driver, petitioner No. 2 is the handyman and petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are the helpers of the vehicle bearing Registration No. AS-26C-8927. The vehicle is a truck and was carrying 24 cattle. It cannot be speculated that the cattle were being transported in a cruel manner.
¶5The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised objection against the bail petition. Page No.# 3/3
¶6I have considered the submission that the petitioners have been behind bars since
17.12.2023.
¶7The cattle and the vehicle have already been seized in connection with this case.
¶8Investigation may have presumably progressed to a considerable extent, by now.
¶9The petitioners are local residents and they have pledged to cooperate with the investigation as well as the trial.
¶10I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.
¶11I have also considered the length of detention of the petitioners.
¶12Considering all aspects, the petitioners are enlarged on bail of Rs. 30,000/-each with a suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Elaka Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro) under the conditions that:-
i) the petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged, and
ii) the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation as well as the trial. On breach of any bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.
¶13Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007782024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./137/2024 MD KARIM ALI AND 3 ORS S/O MD. IMAN ALI R/O VILL- NO. KACHUTALI P.S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2: MD. IKRAMUL ALI S/O MD. MAINUDDIN ALI R/O VILL- TOPATALI P.S. KHETRI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3: MD. RIAJUL ISLAM S/OLT. JOYNAL ABEDIN R/O VILL- KANCHANPUR P.S. RUPAHIHAT DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 4: MD. ABU TALEB S/O LT. JAMAL UDDIN R/O VILL- ROUMARI P.S. RUPOHIHAT DIST. NAGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.