- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 1 February 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 144/2024
Judgment
ORDER
02.02.2024 Heard Mr M Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioners, 1) Md Billal Ahmed, and 2) Page No.# 2/3 Md Abdul Hye Mazarbhuyan.
¶2The petitioners have filed this application under Section 439 CrPC, with prayer for bail, as they are behind bars since 17.12.2023, in connection with Pathsala PS Case No. 81/2023, under Section 379 IPC, read with Sections 66(C)/66(D) of IT Act.
¶3Heard Mr B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶4I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.
¶5The allegation against the petitioners is that the account of the informant, Sri Kanak Chandra Das was hacked and an amount of Rs. 3,41,700/- was withdrawn by the petitioners and another accused, Minazuddin, who is at present, absconding.
¶6The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary, against the present petitioners.
¶7I have perused the Case Diary.
¶8Indeed, there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary, against the petitioners. However, as the investigation has progressed to a considerable extent, it appears that further custodial detention may not be required for further progress of investigation.
¶9The petitioners have pledged to cooperate with the investigation as well as the trial. The petitioners have also pledged to abide by any bail conditions, if imposed upon them.
¶10Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. The petitioners are enlarged on bail of Page No.# 3/3 Rs. 30,000/-each with a suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bajali, under the conditions that:-
i) the petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged, and,
ii) the petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission, till completion of trial, On breach of any bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.
¶11Bail Application stands disposed of.
¶12Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010008202024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./144/2024 MD BILLAL AHMED AND ANR S/O- MAHARAM, R/O- VILLAGE UDALI 7 NO, P.S- LANKA, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN-782446 2: MD. ABDUL HYE MAZARBHUYAN S/O- ABDUL WAHID MAZARBHUYAN R/O- VILLAGE SARUPATHAR P.S- JAMUNAMUKH DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782446 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.