VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Farida Khanam Akanda v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors. F

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
15 February 2024
Bench
Vijay Bishnoi, Suman Shyam
Case no.
WA 34/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010008412024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/34/2024 FARIDA KHANAM AKANDA W/O MD. SAFIQUR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHALKATI PATHER, PO SHALKATI PATHER, PS DHING, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM, 782126 VERSUS

¶1THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. F REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI 19 3:DISTRICT LEVEL SELECTION COMMITTEE (DSC), NAGAON 4:INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL NAGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE DIST NAGAON, ASSAM 78200 For the Appellant : Mr. H. Das, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Mazumdar, Standing Counsel, Education (Secondary) Department. – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

16.02.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

This intra-Court appeal is filed by the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 08.11.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition Page No.# 2/2 [WP(C) No.6328/2023] filed by the appellant/writ petitioner seeking a direction to the State Government to grant relaxation of upper age for the purpose of appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher, has been rejected. The learned Single Judge, taking into consideration the fact that the appellant is already 45 years of age and any direction to the respondents to relax the upper age of the petitioner would amount to direct the respondent authorities to violate the clauses of the Office Memorandum dated 02.09.2020, was of the view that no case for interference was made out. Having heard the learned counsel for appellant and after going through the material available on record, we do not find any case in this writ appeal for interference with the impugned order. Hence, this intra-Court appeal is dismissed, being devoid of merit.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.