- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 28 January 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 235/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 29.01.2024
Heard Mr. A.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 29 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 12.09.2023 passed by the learned Page No.# 3/3 Member, MACT No.2, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 1671/2020. Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the delay occurred in filing the connected appeal is not intentional. He further submits that detailed ground of delay has been explained in the petition. It has further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are not required to be heard in the proceeding of this case as they are the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. Therefore, their names should be struck off from the array of the respondents. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the applicant and also the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 did not raise any objection regarding the prayer of the applicant. Considering all, the delay of 29 days is condoned and the names of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are struck off from array of the respondents in cause title of the appeal at the risk of the applicant. The Registry is directed to do the needful and shall register the connected appeal and list it in admission column. With the above observation, I/A stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010008792024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/235/2024o THEoRELIANCEoGENERALoINSURANCEoCO.oLTD.o HAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoATo19,oRELIANCEoCENTRE,oWALCHANDo HIRACHANDoMARG,oBALLARDoESTATE,oMUMBAIo400001oANDo CORPORAYEoOFFICEoATo570,oRECTIFIERoHOUSE,oNAGAUMoCROSS,oNEXTo TOoROYALoINDUSTRIESoESTATE,oWADALAo(W),oMUMBAIo400031oANDoONEo OFoTHEoBRANCHoOFFICESoAToPRAGoPLAZA,o5THoFLOORoG.S.oROAD,o BHANGAGARHoGUWAHATI-o781005. VERSUSo ELAoBORPATAoGOHAINo@oELAoBORPATRAoGOHAINoDIHINGIAoANDo3oORS.o W/OoLATEoTITHESHWARoDEHINGIA,o PEMANENToRESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoMORANoNATUNoNAGARoP.O.oANDoP.S.o MORANoDIST.-oDIBRUGARHoASSAM,oPIN-o785675. 2:CHANDRAJYOTIoDEHINGIA oS/OoLATEoTITHESHWARoDEHINGIA o PEMANENToRESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoMORANoNATUNoNAGARoP.O.oANDoP.S.o MORANoDIST.-oDIBRUGARHoASSAM oPIN-o785675. 3:MD.oJAFIRoMIAH oC/OoJAHANoMIAH o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoCHAGOLIAoPARToIIoP.O.-oAGOMONIoP.S.-o GOLOKJANGoDIST.-oDHUBRI oASSAMoPIN-o783335. 4:SURAJoSK oS/OoNARULoHAQUEo RESIDENToOFoGAURIPURoWARDoNO.o4oP.O.oANDoP.S.-oGAURIPUR Page No.# 2/3 DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783331 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N BORUAH (R-1) Linked Case : THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD VERSUS ELA BORPATA GOHAIN @ ELA BORPATR GOHAIN DIHINGIA AND 3 ORS F ------------ Advocate for : MR. A J SAIKIA Advocate for : appearing for ELA BORPATA GOHAIN @ ELA BORPATR GOHAIN DIHINGIA AND 3 ORS F BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.