- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 November 2024
- Bench
- Arun Dev Choudhury
- Case no.
- Crl.Rev.P. 329/2013
Judgment
ORDER Date : 06.11.2024 Mr. B Chetri learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the husband and wife has been amiably resolved as they are separated by a decree of divorce and the petitioner had also paid a Page No.# 2/2 permanent alimony of Rs.4,00,000 to the respondent wife. Accordingly, he submits that nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present petition. None appears for the respondent, wife. Be that as it may, as the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter, the present petition stands closed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010009622013 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./329/2013 NABIN PAYENG S/O LT. KAMAL PAYENG VILL- ADI LEKU, P.O. and P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and ANR 2:SMTI KHIRMA BORUAH PAYENG W/O SRI NABIN PAYENG VILL- ADI LEKU P.O. and P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K K PARASAR, MR.P SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.S GOSWAMI, PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.