- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 February 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 155/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15.02.2024
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.7. Also heard Mr. M.P. Sarma, learned counsel for the opposite party/petitioner and Ms. P. Das, learned counsel for the SCERT. By filing this application, the applicant has sought for a direction to the State respondents to give effect to the promotion of the applicant as Principal, DIET, Morigaon as per the recommendation of the DPC by way of interim relief. Vide notification dated 30.06.2023, the inter-se seniority was fixed and accordingly final gradation list of the Senior lecturers of various Districts Institute of Education and Training (DIET) in the State was published. In the said final gradation list of Senior Lecturers of DIET as on 31.05.2023, the name Page No.# 4/5 of the applicant appears at Serial No.2. It is submitted that in respect of the incumbent at Serial No.1 of the said gradation list namely Sri Rajen Dutta, who has been impleaded as respondent No.6 and was going to retire on 31.10.2023, this Court vide order dated 13.10.2023 haspassed an interim order in his favour, which is quoted hereinbelow:- "5. Accordingly, in the interim it is provided that the recommendation of the DPC selecting respondent no. 6 namely Rajen Dutta may be given effect forthwith and the joining of the respondent no. 6 shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petition meaning thereby that in the event this writ petition is dismissed, the joining of the respondent no. 6 would be construed to be a regular joining in the post and if otherwise, on the writ petition being allowed, appropriate order as per law shall follow. "6. In respect of the other private respondents, the State authorities are directed not to fill up any post till the next returnable date. In the meantime, the respondent authorities in the SCERT may file their affidavit, if so advised. The affidavit to be filed by the respondents be completed one week prior to the next returnable date and the writ petitioner if so advised, may file their reply so that the matter would be ready for hearing on the next returnable date." By referring to the above order of this Court, the learned senior counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is also on the same footing and is going to retire on 30.04.2024. Therefore, prays that similar order may be passed directing the State respondents to give effect to the promotion of the applicant as Principal as per the recommendation of the DPC. The challenge in the writ petition is the selection of the respondents including the applicant as Principal DIET on the ground that as per the provisions of the Assam District Institute of Education and Training (DIET) Service Rules, 2010 and the National Council for Teachers Education (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulation 2014, there would be requirement of the qualification of Ph.D in order to be selected and appointed as the Principal. But the respondents including the applicant did not have the qualification of Ph.D. Learned senior counsel for the applicant/respondent No.7 contends that the NCTE Regulations is applicable only to those institutions where the B.Ed degree is being undertaken whereas, the institutions where the respondents including the applicant herein, are appointed as Principals, are imparting D.El.Ed course and not B.Ed Course. As reproduced herein above, after considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the Page No.# 5/5 parties, this Court on 13.10.2023, in the interim, has provided that the recommendation of the DPC selecting the respondent No.6 namely Rajen Dutta may be given effect forthwith and the joining of the respondent No.6 shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petition, meaning thereby, that in the event, the writ petition is dismissed, the joining of the respondent No.6 shall be construed to be a regular joining in the post and if otherwise the writ petition being allowed, appropriate order as per law shall follow. Having considered the submissions, I am of the view that the applicant herein namely Nasimuddin Ahmed who has been arrayed as the respondent No.7 in the writ petition, is a similarly situated person with that of the respondent No.6 namely Sri Rajen Dutta, who is due to retire on 30.04.2024. Thus, I deem it appropriate to allow this interlocutory application. Accordingly, in the interim, it is provided that the recommendation of the DPC selecting the applicant namely Nasimuddinn Ahmed/the respondent No.7 in the writ petition may be given effect forthwith and the joining of the applicant shall be subject to the final outcome of the writ petition. It is needless to observed that in the event the writ petition is dismissed, the joining of the applicant would be construed to be a regular joining in the post and if the writ petition is allowed, appropriate orders that may be passed shall follow. I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010010212024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/155/2024o NASIMUDDINoAHMED,o S/O-oLATEoMUHIBUDDINoAHMED,oR/O-oBEHINDoRAJDHANIoMASJID,o DISPUR,oDIST.-oKAMRUP(M),oGUWAHATI,oASSAM. VERSUSo SWAPNAoSIKHAoCHOUDHURYoANDo13oORS.o W/O-oSANKARoRANJANoPATOWARY,oR/O-oJITENDRAoNAGAR,oWARDoNO.o7,o MANGALDOI,oDIST.oDARRANG,oASSAM. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oDEPARTMENToOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. 3:THEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oDEPARTMENToOFoSCHOOLoEDUCATION oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. 4:THEoDIRECTOR oSTATEoCOUNCILoOFoEDUCATIONALoRESEARCHoANDoTRAINING oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI-781019. 5:SIMANTAoBARTHAKUR oSENIORoLECTURERoANDoPRINCIPALoI/C PageoNo.#o2/5 oDIET oGOALPARA oDUDHNOI oDIST.oGOALPARA oPIN-o783124. 6:ANANTAoGOGOI oSENIORoLECTURERoANDoPRINCIPALoI/C oDIET oJORHAT oDIST.oJORHAT oPIN-o785632. 7:RAJENoDUTTA oS/O-oLATEoDHANIRAMoDUTTA oR/O-oNITAIPUKHURI oSIVASAGAR oP.S.-oDIMOW oDISTRICT-oSIVASAGAR oSONARI 8:BIMANoCH.oDUTTA oS/O-oLATEoRATNESWARoDUTTA oR/O-oSIVASAGARoBISHNUoNAGAR oP.S.oANDoDIST.-oSIVASAGAR oDISTRICT-oSONARI oSIVASAGAR. 9:LABANYAoKR.oDAS oS/O-oLATEoPRANESWARoDAS oR/O-oVILL.oTITKAGURI oPATHSALA oDISTRICT-oBARPETA. 10:MRINALoCHOUDHURY oS/O-oLATEoDEBENDRAoNATHoCHOUDHURY oR/O-oKRISHNAGAR oPATHSALA oDIST.-oBARPETA. 11:RUPoNATHoDAS oS/O-oLATEoRAJENDRAoNATHoDAS oR/O-oVILL.oKOLBARI oP.O.-oBHABANIPUR oDISTRICT-oBARPETA. 12:KISHORoKR.oDAS oS/O-oSRIoLAKSHMIoKANTAoDAS Page No.# 3/5 R/O- HOUSE NO.2 2 NO. MATHGARIA CABIN STOPPAGE ZOO NARENGI ROAD DIST.- KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI. 13:ALAKESH DUTTA S/O- LATE UMESH CH. DUTTA PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SAMGURI NAGAON AND POSTED AS SENIOR LECTURER AT DISTRICT INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL TRAINING SAMAGURI NAGAON DISTRICT. 14:DAISY GOGOI D/O- LATE DR. HEMA KANTA GOGOI R/O- H. NO.-2 RAJGARH BYE LANE-5 DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.