VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

A S M Mashud Laskar v. The State of Assam and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 February 2024
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 359/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 02/02/2024

Heard Ms. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Borpujari, learned standing counsel, Finance Department and Mr. P. Handique, learned standing counsel, P & RD.

¶2This writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying for grant of minimum wages. Petitioner is working as a Chowkidar at fixed pay basis in the Office of Narainpur-Tupkhana Gaon Panchayat. He is being presently paid a fixed pay of Rs.7,200/- per month. Since his date of appointment on 03.02.2005, the petitioner has been rendering his services. However, during the course of the arguments the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage the writ petitioner want to rely on the Judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court rendered in W.A. No.45/2014 (the State of Assam and Ors. Vs Upen Das and Ors.), which is disposed of on 08.06.2017.

¶3Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and upon careful perusal Page No.# 3/4 of the pleadings on record including the Judgment dated 08.06.2017 passed in Upen Das (supra), this court is of the view that if the claim for regularization of the petitioner is not pressed at this stage and the only limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to pay the minimum of the pay scale, then the matter stands covered in terms of the directions contained in paragraph 22 of the Judgment of Upen Das (supra). The claim for regularization of the services of the writ petitioner having not perused at this stage, is left open to be decided in an appropriate proceeding, if so advised. For convenience paragraph 22 of the Judgment rendered in Upen Das (supra) is extracted below:- "22. It is, however, heartening to learn that the State Government has agreed not to terminate the Muster Roll, Work Charged and similarly placed employees working since last more than 10 years (not in sanctioned post) till their normal retirement, except on disciplinary ground or on ground of criminal offences. The State Government has also agreed to enlist such employees in Health and Accidental and Death Insurance Scheme, which will be prepared in consultation with the State Cabinet. We appreciate this positive stand of the State Government taken as welfare measures for the betterment and security of the employees, in question. We, accordingly, direct the State Government to implement the measures without further delay. Besides this, we, in the light of decision of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab vs. Jagjit Singh, (2017) 1 SCC 148, also direct the State Government to pay minimum of the pay scale to Muster Roll workers, Work Charged workers and similarly placed employees working since last more than 10 years (not in sanctioned post) with effect from 1.8.2017."

¶4The writ petition, therefore, stands closed with a direction to the respondents, more particularly, the Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Dispur to examine the claim of the petitioner in respect of their entitlement for being paid the minimum of the Page No.# 4/4 pay scale in terms of the Judgment of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in Upen Das (supra) and thereafter if the claim of the petitioner is found to be genuine then the benefits that will accrued to the petitioner in terms of the said Judgment should be released expeditiously.

¶5Accordingly, the department will now examine the prayer of the writ petitioner and thereafter pass a speaking order and thereafter, if found to be entitled, his benefits as prayed for shall be released.

¶6This exercise shall be completed within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order to be submitted by the petitioner.

¶7Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No order as to cost.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010040732023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/359/2023o AoSoMoMASHUDoLASKAR S/O-oABDULoHASIMoLASKAR oVILL-oHAILAKANDI oWARDoNO.1 oP.O-oBICHINGCHA oP.S-oHAILAKANDI oDIST-oHAILAKANDI oASSAM oPIN-o788151 oVERSUS THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORS REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM oPANCHAYAToANDoRURALoDEVELOPMENT oASSAM oGHY-o06 2:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARY TOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM oPANCHAYAToANDoRURALoDEVELOPMENToDEPTT oDISPUR oGHY-o06 o3:THEoCOMMISSIONER PANCHAYAToANDoRURALoDEVELOPMENT oASSAM oPANJABARI oJURIPAR oGUWAHATI-o37 o4:THEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARY TOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM oFINANCEoDEPTT oDISPUR Page No.# 2/4 GHY- 06 5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HAILAKANDI ZILLA PARISHAD HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI 6:THE SECRETARY NARAINPUR-TUPKHANA GP DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151 ------------ Advocate for : MR F U BARBHUIYA Advocate for : SC P AND R.D. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.