Animesh Dutta and 6 Ors v. Basundhara Realtors Pvt. Ltd and Anr

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010013742013 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oRFA/61/2013o ANIMESHoDUTTAoando6oORS.o S/OoLATEoANATHoBANDHUoDUTTA 2:oSMTIoRUPAoDUTTA oW/OoLATEoATANUoDUTTA 3:oSMT.oABHIRIoDUTTAoMINOR oD/OoLATEoATANUoDUTTA 4:oADITYAoDUTTAoMINOR oS/OoLATEoATANUoDUTTA o2oBoANDo2oCoREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEIRoMOTHERoANDoNATURALo GUARDIAN oSMTIoRUPAoDUTTA oTHEoAPPELLANToNO.o2oA 5:oSMTIoANJANAoDUTTA oD/OoLATEoANATHoBANDHUoDUTTA 6:oSMTIoARPITAoDUTTA oW/OoSRIoSIBENDRAoKUMARoDUTTAoANDoDAUGHTERoOFoLATEoANATHo BANDHUoDUTTA 7:oSMTIoANINDITAoDUTTA oW/OoLATEoARUPoKUMARoDUTTA 8:oANIRBANoDUTTA o PageoNo.#o2/3 9:oARINDAMoDUTTA oBOTHo6oando7oSONSoOFoLATEoARUPoKUMARoDUTTA oALLoAREoR/OoSHILLONGPATTY oSILCHARoTOWN oP.S.oSILCHAR oDIST.oCACHAR oASSAMo VERSUSo BASUNDHARAoREALTORSoPVT.oLTDoandoANR.o AoCOMPANYoINCORPORATEDoUNDERoTHEoCOMPANIESoACT,oHAVINGoITSo REGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToJAILoROAD,oSILCHAR,oP.S.oSILCHAR,oDIST.o CACHAR,oASSAM. 2:SMTIoDEEPAoROY oW/OoSRIoTAPASHoROY oR/OoPHEoCOMPLEX oMEHARPUR oP.O.oandoP.S.oSILCHAR oDIST.oCACHAR oASSAMo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.AoBARKATAKIo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMR.BoKoPURKAYASTHAoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkR

11.01.2024 o Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. P. Bharadwaj, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. B.K. Jain, the learned counsel representing the respondent nos.2. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. Choudhury and Mr. Jain jointly submit that the case has been settled between the appellants and the respondent no.2. Mr. Choudhury further submits that the respondent no.1, which is a company, no longer exists. Mr. Choudhury, therefore, submits that for this reason, he does not want to press this appeal. After hearing the learned counsels of both sides, the prayer of Mr. Choudhury is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed as not pressed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant