- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 February 2024
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- WP(C) 630/2024
Judgment
ORDER
12.02.2024
Mr. N. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to approach again with better particulars.
Ms. M. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Public Health Engineering [PHE] Department for the respondent nos. 1 – 4 has submitted that there would be no objection if the writ petition is withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010014502024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/630/2024o KABIRoAHMEDoCHOUDHURYo S/O-oLATEoALIoRAJAoCHOUDHURY,oR/O-oUZANNAGAR,oP.O.oBORKHOLA,o DISTRICT-oCACHAR,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAMoPUBLICo HEALTHoENGINEERINGoDEPARTMENT,oHENGRABARI,oGUWAHATI-36 2:THEoMISSIONoDIRECTOR oJALoJEEVANoMISSION oASSAM oPHEDoBUILDING oHENGRABARI oGUWAHATI-36 3:THEoCHIEFoENGINEERo(PHE) oWATER oHENGRABARI oGUWAHATI-36 4:THEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEERo(PHE) oSILCHARoDIVISIONoNO.1 oSILCHAR 5:ZIAURoRAHMANoBARBHUIYA oPROP.oOFoD.A.BUILDERoANDoCONSULTANCYoR/O-oVILL-oMOHANPURoP.O.o KALIBARIoBAZAR oDIST.-oHAILAKANDI oASSAM oPIN-o78815o Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P H E BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.