VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Ala Uddin v. The Union of India

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
15 February 2023
Bench
Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, Robin Phukan
Case no.
WP(C) 487/2018

Judgment

ORDER Date : 15-02-2023 (Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J)

Heard Mr. G Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 5, Ms. G Sarma, learned standing counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2, 6 and 7, Ms. U Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 and Mr. A. I. Ali, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4.

¶3The petitioner was referred to the Foreigner's Tribunal No.10, Nagaon for an opinion as to whether he is a person who entered the State of Assam through the specified territory subsequent to 25.03.1971. Although the petitioner could not produce the appropriate documents before the Tribunal but before this Court by means of additional affidavit the voters list of 1970 of village Nam Doboka Gaon, PS Page No.# 3/3 Hojai, District – Nagaon has been produced wherein, the name of Mekai Miya S/o of Mosab appears at serial No.400.

¶4The petitioner has also produced the voters list of 1989 of village Nam Doboka Gaon, P.S Hojai, wherein at serial No.884 in respect of House No.149, the name of Mekai Miya Mazumder, S/o Mosab appears and at serial No.886 the name of Alauddin, S/o Mekai appears, both in respect of House No.149.

¶5If the voters list of 1970 and 1989 of village Nam Doboka Village is accepted, the petitioner prima facie establishes that he is the son of Mekai Miya of 1970 voters list and therefore, he has to be considered as a citizen of India.

¶6Accordingly the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal, wherein the petitioner would be allowed to exhibit the two aforesaid voters list of 1979 and 1989 of village Nam Doboka Gaon as well as any further document as the petitioner may desire.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 22.03.2023. Upon the aforesaid material being produced, the Tribunal shall pass a reasoned order upon the claim of the petitioner and if the reasoned order to be passed is in favour of the petitioner, the same would prevail over the opinion dated 30.10.2017 passed in F.T(D). Case No.867/2008 by the Foreigners Tribunal, Nagaon, Court No.10 at Sankardev Nagar, Hojai, Assam and if it is against, the implications under the law may follow.

¶8Till such reasoned order is passed, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.

¶9The petition stands allowed as indicated above.

¶10Send back the LCR.

J U D G E Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010015782018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/487/2018o ALAoUDDINo S/O.oLT.oMAKHALoMIYA,oVILL.oBALIRAMoGAON,oWARDoNO.3,oP.S.o JAMUNAMUKH,oDIST.oHOJAI/NAGAON,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAo REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFoHOMEo AFFAIRS,oNEWoDELHI 2:THEoCOMM.oANDoSECY. oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY. 3:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oHOJAI oDIST.oHOJAI oASSAM 4:THEoCHIEFoELECTIONoOFFICER oTHEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oNIRVACHANoSADAN oASHOKAoROAD oNEWoDELHI oDELHI 5:THEoOFFICEoOFoTHEoSTATEoCOORDINATORoOFoNATIONALo REGISTRATIONo(NRC)oASSAM Page No.# 2/3 REP. BY IT'S COORDINATOR 1ST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA BHANGAGARH GHY. ASSAM 6:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE (B) HOJAI DIST. HOJAI ASSAM 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE JAMUNAMUKH POLICE STATION DIST. HOJAI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : G UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.