VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Khodaza Khatun v. Union of India and 6 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
20 February 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathak, Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Case no.
WP(C) 854/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010016412024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/854/2024o KHODAZAoKHATUNo W/O-oA.ZABBARoVILLAGE-oHAToCHARA,oPOLICEoSTATION-oBARPETAo ROAD,oDISTRICT-oBARPETAo(ASSAM),oPIN-VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo6oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oDEPTToOFoHOMEo AFFAIRS,oNEWoDELHI,oINDIA 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR 3:ELECTIONoCOMMISSIONoOFoINDIA oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoELECTIONoOFFICER oBONGAIGAON 4:NATIONALoREGISTERoOFoCITIZENS oASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSTATEoCOORDINATORo1SToFLOOR oACHYUToPLAZA oBHANGAGARH oGUWAHATI oASSAM 5:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oBARPETA oASSAM 6:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oBARPETA oASSAM Page No.# 2/3 7:THE FRRO BARPETA SPECIAL REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICE (SFRRO) BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. B GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI 21/02/2024 (M.R. Pathak, J) Heard Ms. M Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A Kalita, learned Standing counsel, Home Department, Assam for the respondent Nos. 2, 6 & 7; Mr. H Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A I Ali, learned Standing counsel, Election Commission of India for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. P Sharma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 5. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on 16.02.2024 challenging the impugned opinion/order dated 14.03.2023 passed by the learned Member, Foreigners' Tribunal 9th Barpeta, Assam in F.T. 9th (BPT) Case No. 795/2018, whereby she was declared to be a foreigner under the Foreigners Act, 1946. On instruction of the petitioner, Ms. Bora, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of this writ petition. Prayer is allowed. This writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.

JUDGE JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.