- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 12 February 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak, Sanjay Kumar Medhi
- Case no.
- WP(C) 623/2024
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010016752024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/623/2024o MDoKHAMALoAZADo@oKALAMoAZADo@oAoKALAMo SONoOFoLATEoMD.oKAMARoUDDINo@oKUMARoUDDINoMIAo@oKUMARo UDDINoSEIKH,oRESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-oNARAYANGURI,oP.S.o GOBARDHANA,oDISTRICT-oBAKSA,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo6oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoINDIA,o MINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oNORTHoBLOCK,oNEWoDELHI-o110001 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-o781006 3:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONERoOFoINDIA oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoOFoINDIA oNIRVACHANoSADAN oASOKAoROAD oNEWoDELHI-o110001 4:THEoSTATEoCOORDINATORoOFoNRC oOFFICEoOFoTHEoSTATEoCOORDINATORoNRCoASSAM o1SToFLOOR oACHYUToPLAZA oGSoROAD oBHANGAGARH oGUWAHATI oASSAM-o781005 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA MUSLIMPATTY JYOTIGAON DISTRICT-BARPETA ASSAM-781301 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) BAKSA ASSAM 7:OFFICER IN CHARGE GOBORDHANA POLICE STATION DISTRICT-BAKSA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D GHOSH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI 13/02/2024 (M.R. Pathak, J) Heard Ms. D Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A Verma, learned Standing counsel, Home Department, Assam for the respondent Nos. 2, 6 & 7; Mr. H Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A I Ali, learned Standing counsel, Election Commission of India for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. P Sharma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 5. It is submitted by Ms. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner that due to her inadvertent mistake, she failed to fill up the relevant paragraphs in the affidavit sworn by the petitioner. Hence, she prayed for withdrawal of this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh to which the learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. Prayer is allowed. Page No.# 3/3 Liberty as prayed for, so granted. This writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.