- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 19 February 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 322/2024
Judgment
ORDER
20.02.2024 Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. Mehta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. R.K. Dev Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. This is an application seeking impleadment of M/S Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corporation Limited (IRCTC) as party respondent No. 5 in the connected writ petition. Mr. A. Choudhury submits that the IRCTC Limited is the Nodal Agency which had floated tender in question and as such, it is a necessary party. The prayer of impleadment is not opposed by the respondents. I have heard the submissions made at the bar and also perused the averments made in the impleading application. It appears that the presence of IRCTC Limited is necessary for effective adjudication of the matter. As such, IRCTC Ltd. is a necessary party. Page No.# 4/4 Accordingly, it is directed that M/S Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corporation Limited (IRCTC) be impleaded as respondent No. 5 in the connected writ petition. A copy of the amended cause title be submitted to the Registry for doing the needful. Accordingly, the IA stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010010222024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:ooI.A.(Civil)/322/2024 M/SoRATHOURoSERVICESoANDo2oORS AoPROPRIETORSHIPoCONCERNoHAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToKHAGRI oTAKJAPAR oP.O.oDIGHA oP.SoDANAPUR oPATNAo-800012 oBIHAR oTHROUGHoITSoAUTHORIZEDoREPRESENTATIVEoSANJEEVoDAS. 2:oSANJEEVoDAS CHIEFoEXECUTIVEoOFFICERoANDoAUTHORIZEDoREPRESENTATIVEoOFoM/So RATHOURoSERVICESoC/O-oNABINoDAS oR/O-oBARSARKUCHI oNALBARI oASSAM-781337. o3:oMOBILEoCATERERSoWELFAREoASSOCIATION HAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToA-25 oGALIoNO.o5 oCHANDRAoVIHAR PATPARGANJ oDELHI-110092 THROUGHoITSoAUTHORIZEDoREPRESENTATIVEoMR.oSATYABHANoSINGH. oVERSUS THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo3oORS THROUGHoTHEoSECRETARY oMNISTRYoOFoRAILWAYS oRAILoBHAWAN oRAISINAoROAD NEWoDELHI-110001. 2:THEoRAILWAYoBOARD THROUGHoTHEoDIRECTORo(TOURISIMoANDoCATERING) oRAILoBHAWAN PageoNo.#o2/4 oRAISINAoROAD oNEWoDELHI-110001. o3:THEoNORTHoEASToFRONTIERoRAILWAYS THROUGHoITSoGENERALoMANAGER oMALIGAON oGHY. o4:THEoDEPUTYoCHIEFoCOMMERCIALoMANAGER N.F.oRAILWAY oMALIGAON oGHY. o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oMS.oBoCHOWDHURY Advocateoforo:oDY.S.G.I.oappearingoforoTHEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo3oORS ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo WP(C)/317/2024o M/SoRATHOURoSERVICESoANDo2oORSo AoPROPRIETORSHIPoCONCERNoHAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToKHAGRIoTAKJAPAR P.O.oDIGHAoP.SoDANAPURoPATNAo800012oBIHARoTHROUGHoITSo AUTHORIZEDoREPRESENTATIVEoSANJEEVoDAS 2:oSANJEEVoDAS oCHIEFoEXECUTIVEoOFFICERoANDoAUTHORIZEDoREPoOFoM/SoRATHURo SERVICESoC/OoNABINoDASoR/OoBARSARKUCHIoNALBARIoASSAMo781337 3:oMOBILEoCATERERSoWELFAREoASSOCIATION oHAVINGoITSoOFFICEoAToAo25oGALIoNO.o5oCHANDRAoVIHARoPATPARGANJo DELHIo110092oTHROUGHoITSoAUTHORIZEDoREPRESENTATIVEoMRo SATYABHANoSINGHoAGEo48oYEARo VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDoORSo THROUGHoTHEoSECRETARYoMINISTRYoOFoRAILWAYoRAILoBHAWANo RAISINAoROADoNEWoDELHIo110001 2:THEoRAILWAYoBOARD oTHROUGHoTHEoDIRECTORoTOURISMoANDoCATERINGoRAILoBHAWANo RAISINAoROADoNEWoDELHIo110001 3:THEoNORTHoEASToFRONTIEDoRAILWAYS oTHROUGHoITSoGENERALoMANAGERoMALIGAONoGUWAHATI 4:THEoDEPUTYoCHIEFoCOMMERCIALoMANAGERoNFoRAILWAY oMALIGAONoGUWAHATo Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. Linked Case : B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.