- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 4 February 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 302/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 05-02-2024 Heard Mr. M.I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners Khwrwmshar Page No.# 2/3 Brahma @ Khurwmshar Brahma and Birkhat Narzary @ Birkhat Narjary.
¶2The petitioners have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC for short) with prayer for bail as they are behind bars since 07.11.2023 in connection with Sessions Case No. 01/2024 arising out of OR No. BGN/06 of 2023-24 registered under Sections 9, 39, 48 (A), 49(B), 50, 51 and 57 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
¶3Heard D. Gogoi, learned Special Public Prosecutor Wildlife
¶4The learned Special Public Prosecutor has serious objection stating that this matter is prejudiced and is pending trial before the learned Court of Sessions Judge, Bongaigaon. The petitioners can approach the learned Court of Sessions Judge and apply for bail. The petitioners are not entitled to bail as they were caught red handed while smuggling gecko which is a serious offence under the Wildlife Protection Act and is a scheduled animal under Schedule II of the Act.
¶5I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. I have considered the submissions that the petitioners have been behind bars for 91 (Ninety One) days. The petitioner No. 1 who is an LP School Headmaster has lost his job and he is now suffering immensely as he is unemployed. It is also submitted that the petitioner No. 2 was an ex-service man. I have also considered the submissions that the petitioners are local residents and they are willing to abide by any stringent bail conditions to be imposed upon them. It is also submitted that the petitioners are willing to cooperate with the trial.
¶6Under the peculiar circumstances of this case, petition is allowed. Page No.# 3/3
¶7The petitioners are enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Bongaigaon under the conditions that:
i) The petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged.
ii) The petitioners are directed not to leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior written permission till completion of the trial.
iii) The petitioners shall cooperate with the trial as well as with the investigation.
¶8On breach of any bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.
In the above terms this Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010018542024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./302/2024 KHWRWMSHAR BRAHMA @ KHURWMSHAR BRAHMA AND ANR S/O- SURESH CHANDRA BRAHMA, R/O VILL-KASHIBARI P/S DHALIGAON DIST CHIRANG ASSAM 2: BIRKHAT NARZARY @ BIRKHAT NARJARY S/O- PANIRAM NARZARY R/O- VILL- MAREGAON P.O. JARKONA P.S. TAMULPUR DISTRICT- BAKSHA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY PP ASSAM 2:THE FOREST DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY THE SC FOREST DEPARTMENT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.