- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 January 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 278/2024
Judgment
O R D E R
30.01.2024
¶1Heard Mr. Y. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. for the State respondent.
¶2This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying for granting regular bail to the petitioner, Dilwar Ali, who was arrested on 07.01.2024 in connection with Sonapur P.S. Case No. 280/2023, registered under Sections 379/411/413 IPC.
¶3The case of the prosecution in brief is that the accused/petitioner has stolen articles from a vehicle which was seized by the police officer in connection with another offence and thereafter, the accused/petitioner has hidden the stolen articles in the shop of Sajamul Ali.
¶4The case diary as called for is placed before this Court.
¶5It appears that the investigation is going on the statements have been recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. It further submits that some of the stolen articles have already been recovered.
¶6Considering above, this Court is of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner may not be necessary. Page No.# 3/3
¶7Considering all aspects, the petitioner namely Dilwar Ali is allowed to go on bail in connection with the above noted case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M), Guwahati.
¶8The bail granted to the petitioner shall be subject to the following conditions-
i) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation,
ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; and
iii) The petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged, failing which, bail orders shall stand cancelled.
¶9With the above observation, this bail application stands allowed.
¶10This disposes of the bail application. Send back the case diary.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010020112024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./278/2024o DILWARoALIo S/O-oRAHIMoALI,oR/O-oVILL.-oSONAPURoPATHAR,oP.O.oSONAPUR,oDIST.o KAMRUP(M),oASSAM,oPIN-o782402. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoP.P.,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oYoSIKDARo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.