- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 April 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- AB 256/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 01.05.2024
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. R.M. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Budhin Borthakur, apprehending arrest in connection with Lotasil P.S. Case No. 229/2023, registered under Section 120B/409/420/468 IPC r/w Section 417 of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (Second Amendment) Act, 2006 and Section 269 of Assam Municipal Corporation Act, 2022. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Police Officer as per direction of this Court and his statement has already been recorded after he was granted interim protection. He has not misused the liberty granted to him; rather, he co-operates with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the privilege of pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner may be made absolute. Mr. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the petitioner may appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. It is also submitted that the statement of petitioner has already been recorded by the investigating officer. It is further submitted that the he has objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the case diary. It appears that the petitioner has not misused the liberty granted to him while availing interim protection. It is directed to the petitioner to appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. Considering all, this Court is of the view that the petitioner Page No.# 3/3 deserves to be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 05.02.2024, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions, as reflected. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010021322024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/256/2024 BUDHIN BORTHAKUR S/O SRI PADMA BORTHAKUR, R/O E-3, SANTINILOY, 515 BYE LANE MOTHER TERESA ROAD, GUWAHATI, DIST-KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PIN-781021 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.