- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 February 2024
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 351/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 01.03.2024
¶1Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who submits that though the case diary was called for in this case, however, in the meanwhile, charge-sheet has been laid vide Charge-sheet No. 67/2024 dated 21.02.2024. Page No.# 2/3
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been detained behind the bars for last 56 days and presently he is admitted to LGB Chest Hospital, Guwahati since 20.01.2024 as he is suffering from Tuberculosis.
¶3On perusal of the report of the Superintendent of LGB Hospital, Guwahati dated 19.02.2024 which was forwarded to this Court by the Superintendent of Central Jail, Guwahati, it appears that though all the parameters of the present petitioners are within normal limits. However, he is still under medication for treatment of tuberculosis.
¶4Considering the health condition of the petitioner and also considering the fact that the investigation in this case has already been completed, this Court is of the considered opinion that further custodial detention may not be necessary, if he cooperates in the trial.
¶5In view of the above, the petitioner, namely, Ramash Doimary @ Ramesh Daimary @ Raju @ Bijay is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees Thirty Thousand) only with one surety to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M) with following conditions:-
¶1That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who may be acquainted with the facts of this case so as to dissuade such person from deposing against the petitioner in the ensuing trial before the trial court.
¶2That the petitioner shall appear before the trial court as and when so required by the trial court
¶3That the trial court may impose any additional condition for bail during trial if it deems fit to do so, to procure regular attendance of the Page No.# 3/3 petitioner during trial.
¶6With the above observation, this bail application is hereby disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010022552024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./351/2024 RAMASH DOIMARY @ RAMESH DAIMARY @ RAJU @ BIJAY S/O SHRI GENDRA DAIMARY VILL- DAKHIN KUMRIKATA P.S. TAMULPUR DIST.TAMULPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.