VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Akash Ray v. The State of Assam Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
18 February 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 341/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 19-02-2024

Heard Ms. F. Hussain, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. R. J. Barua, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This application, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by accused, Akash Ray, who has been languishing in jail hajot since 9.12.2023, in connection with Bongaigaon P. S Case No. 525/2023, under Sections 376/506 IPC read with Section 4 of POCSO Act, for grant of bail. It is to be noted here that the above noted case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by one Madan Sarkar on 9.12.2023. The essence of allegation made in the FIR dated 9.12.2023 is that on

8.12.2023, at about 8 PM, accused Akash Ray kidnapped his minor daughter, namely, Smt.'X' ( name withheld) aged about 16 years, from Pukhurpar, New Bongaigaon to some unknown places, but returned on the same day at about

11.30 P.M. and when asked her about cause of delay, then his daughter informed that the accused committed rape upon her at New Bongaigaon, near Vivekananda H.S. School and threatened her not to disclose the same to anybody else. The learned counsel for the accused submits that the accused was arrested on

9.12.2023, and since then he has been languishing in jail hajot and he is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency and therefore, it is contended to allow the petition. On the other hand, Mr. Barua, learned Addl. P.P. submits that he obtained Page No.# 3/3 necessary instruction from the Officer-in-Charge of concerned Police station and submits that after completion of investigation the I.O has laid charge sheet, being Charge sheet No.24/2024, dated 8.2.2024, under Sections 376/506 IPC read with Section 4 of POCSO Act. In view of the submission of learned Advocate of both sides, this Court is inclined to dispose of this petition by directing the accused to appear before the learned Court below and to file appropriate petition and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same, in accordance with law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010023442024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./341/2024 AKASH RAY R/O DANGTOLA, PUKHURIPAR P.S. BONGAIGAO, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:Madan Sarkar RO Changaigaon PS Bongaigaon 2:MADAN SARKAR S/O LATE KARTIK SARKAR R/O CHANGAPUTA P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.