VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Mahsen Ali v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 May 2024
Bench
Lanusungkum Jamirauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 5041/2016

Judgment

ORDER Date : 31.05.2024

Heard Mrs. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Kaushik, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department for all the respondents.

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as a Grade-IV Chowkidar in the Janata High School, Burinagar on the basis of a resolution of the Managing Committee of the said school. The petitioner joined to the said post on

02.10.1996. The Inspector of Schools, NDC, Nalbari by an order dated 06.12.1994 provisionally approved the appointment of teaching and non-teaching staffs of the said Janata High School, Burinagar and in the said order the name of the petitioner appears at Sl. No. 13. The teaching and non-teaching staffs of the Janata High School, Burinagar was provincialised on 22.03.1996. However, the name of the petitioner was dropped.

¶3On the directions passed by this Court by order dated 23.06.2014, in WP(C)/2350/2013, the case of the petitioner was placed before the High Power Committee. The High Power Committee in its meeting held on 30.09.2015, could not recommend the case of the petitioner on the ground that there is a provision of only one post of Grade-IV in a High School and one sanctioned post of Grade-IV was allotted to the School at the time of provincialisation and as the petitioner joined as 2nd Grade-IV, his case could not be recommended. Page No.# 3/5

¶4The relevant portion of the resolution of the High Power Committee which held its meeting on 30.09.2015 reads as under: "The matter of Md. Mahsen All of Janata High School, Burinagar, Nalbari was placed before the committee. As per Govt. Memo No. PMA.13/95/79 dtd 22/11/95, PMA.13/95/81 dtd 29/02/96 and PMA.13/95/PT-III/12 td 29/02/96 there is a provision of only 1(one) post of Grade-IV in a High School and one sanctioned post of Grade-IV was allotted to the school at the time of provincialisation. The petitioner in this case joined as 2nd Grade IV. Therefore as per norms his name was not recommended by High Power Committee as dropped Grade-IV employee of the school."

¶5Mrs. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of an order dated 16.07.2013, by which one Md. Abdul Kuddus was appointed in a Grade-IV post in Langla Higher Secondary School which clearly indicates that the appointment of a Grade-IV post is possible in a Higher Secondary section of a Higher Secondary School. The order dated 16.07.2013 reads as under:

"In pursuance of Govt. Letter No. ELC/WP© 1785/2009/226/ Pt./106 dt. 02.03.2013 communicated vide DSE's letter No. PC/Sec.71/2011/306 dt. 08.07.2016 the following 2 Nos. dropped Grade –IV are hereby appointed in the Schools shown against their names with Prospective effect. This has been issued with the approval of Finance (SIU) Deptt. Vide their approval No. FSI.38/13 dt. 18-02-2013. The appointee concerned has to furnish an undertaking before Joining in the school as Prescribed by the Finance (Budget) Department issued vide their letter No. BW/S/2003/Pt.- II/1 dt. 25-01-2005 regarding introduction of New Pension rule 2005" along with their Joining report. SL No. Name of appointment Designation Name of the School Scale of Pay where appointed

¶1Md. Abdul Kuddus Gr-IV Langla H.S.S. Rs.4560-15000/- Page No.# 4/5 with Grade Pay of Rs.1500/- P.M. (under Pay band-1)

¶2Md. Jahir Ali Gr-IV G. N. Bardoloi -Do-Memorial H.S. Sd/- Amir Hussain Inspector of Schools Barpeta Dist. Circle, Barpeta

Memo No. E/A-314/2002/3896-902 Dated Barpeta the 16/07/13 Copy to:

¶1Xxxxx

¶2Xxxxx xxxxx"

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is similarly situated with that of the said Md. Abdul Kuddus.

¶6Mr. B. Kaushik, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department submits that the respondents may be directed to reconsider the matter as to whether the case of the petitioner is similar with that of the said Md. Abdul Kuddus.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is similarly situated as the aforesaid Md. Abdul Kuddus, similar treatment may be afforded by giving appointment to the Grade-IV post in the said school Page No.# 5/5 which exercise shall be under taken and completed within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order of this Court.

¶8Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010023472016 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5041/2016o MD.oMAHSENoALIo R/OoLT.oLOCHANoALI,oP.O.oBURINAGAR,oP.S.oNALBARI,oDIST-oNALBARI,o ASSAM,oWORKINGoASoGRADEoIVoEMPLOYEEoINoJANATAoHIGHoSCHOOL,o BURIGAON,oNALBARI VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoandoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,o EDUCATIONoDEPTT.,oDISPUR,oGHY-6 2:THEoDIRECTORoOFoEDUCATIONoSECONDARY oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGHY-19 3:THEoINSPECTORoOFoSCHOOLS oNALBARIoDISTRICToCIRCLE oNALBARI oASSAM 4:THEoJT.oSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oEDUCATIONoELEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-6 oANDoMEMBERoSECY.oHIGHoPOWERoCOMMITTEE oDISPUR oGHY-o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMS.KoDEVIo Page No.# 2/5 Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE, SC, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.