- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 18 February 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 380/2024
Judgment
ORDER
19.02.2024 Heard Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel for the accused and also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent.
¶2This application, under section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by accused, namely, Kader Page No.# 2/3 Ali, who has been languishing in jail hazot since 07.01.2024, in connection with Bilasipara P.S. Case No.04/2024, under Section 365/511/34 IPC, for grant of bail.
¶3It is to be noted here that the above noted case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by one Mainul Islam on 05.01.2024. The essence of allegation made in the aforesaid FIR is that on 05.01.2024, at about 12:00 p.m. one Afjalur Rahman, Kader Ali, Nuru Mandal, Nur Amin, Jamat Ali, Member and Rohim have stolen the informant Mainul Islam in a car, bearing Registration No.AS-18D-4900 from a petrol pump situated at Hakama and he was recovered by public and handed over to police along with one of the accused.
¶4Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the accused, submits that the accused was arrested on 07.01.2024 and for last 43 days he is behind the bar. Mr. Islam further submits that the informant cum victim has already been recovered immediately after the occurrence and the victim himself lodged the FIR with the police station and that further custodial detention of the accused may not be required and therefore, it is contended to allow the petition.
¶5On the other hand, Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, submits that the investigation is pending for arrest of the co-accused and therefore, Mr. Sarma has opposed the petition.
¶6Having heard the submission of learned Advocates for both sides, I have carefully gone through the petition and the documents placed on record and also perused the case diary with the assistance of Mr. Sarma, learned Additional P.P.
¶7The case diary indicates that the I.O. has collected some material in support of the allegation made in the FIR. But it also appears that the victim has already been recovered and the present accused is behind the bar for last 43 days and balancing the period of detention with the nature and gravity of the offence, this Court is of the view that further custodial detention of the present accused may not be required in the interest of investigation and therefore, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. It is provided that Page No.# 3/3 on furnishing a bond of ` 50,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M.(M), Bilasipara, in connection with Bilasipara P.S. Case No.04/2024, under Section 365/511/34 IPC, the accused, namely, Kader Ali, be enlarged on bail. Case diary be returned.
¶8In terms of above, this bail application stands disposed of. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010023992024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./380/2024 KADER ALI S/O KASHEM ALI VILL- ANDURJHAR PT.II P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD B ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.