VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Union of India and Anr v. N. Lungmuana and 50 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
10 December 2024
Bench
Vijay Bishnoi, Kaushik Goswami
Case no.
WA 129/2022

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/6 GAHC010024082021 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWA/129/2022o

1.UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDoANRo 2:oDIRECTORoGENERALoASSAMoRIFLESoSHILLONG oREP.oBYoCOMMANDANTo46oASSAMoRIFLES,oAIZAWLoMIZORAo VERSUSo

1.N.oLUNGMUANAoANDo50oORS.o S/O-oDARCHHUNGAo(L),oR/O-oELECTRICoVENG,oAIZAWL. 2:LAITHUAMI oD/O-oCHHUNRUMAooR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 3:AIKIMA oS/O-oZANGENAo(L)ooR/O-oRAMHLUNoSOUTHoAIZAWL. 4:THANSIAMA oS/O-oKUNGAo(L)oR/O-oRAMTHARoVENGoAIZAWL. 5:R.oLALDUAILOVA oS/O-oKAWMAo(L)oR/O-oRAMTHARoVENGoAIZAWL. 6:ZODINTLUANGI oD/O-oCoTHANMAWIAoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 7:ZOHMINGTHANGI oD/O-oKAPTLUANGAoR/O-oCHALTLANGoAIZAWL. 8:ZOTHANSIAMI oD/O-oC.oTHANMAWIAoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 9:ZONUNPUIA oS/O-oC.oTHANMAWIAo(L)oR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. PageoNo.#o2/6 10:N.oLUNGMUANA oS/O-oDARCHHUNGAoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 11:ZOTHANKHUMA oS/O-oCH.oTHANGAoR/O-oZOTLANGoAIZAWL. 12:LALHMACHHUANA oS/O-oTHANGDAILOVAoR/O-oCHHINGAoVENGoAIZAWL. 13:LALREMI oD/O-oTHANGDAILOVAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 14:VARHLUNNCHHUNGA oS/O-oTHANGDAILOVAoR/O-oCHHINGAoVENGoAIZAWL. 15:VANLALRAWNA oS/O-oTHLUAIAoR/O-oCHHINGAoVENGoAIZAWL. 16:LALDIKI oD/O-oTHANGDAILOVAoR/O-oCHHINGAoVENGoAIZAWL. 17:VANLALAUVA oS/O-oTHANGDAILOVAoR/O-oCHHINGAoVENGoAIZAWL. 18:LUNGHNEMI oD/O-oKAPCHHUMAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 19:THANGDAILOVI oD/O-oKAPCHHUMAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 20:VANLALHMANGI oD/O-oKAPCHHUMAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 21:F.oVANLALSIAMA oS/O-oF.oNIKUNGAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 22:ZALAWRA oS/O-oKHUNANGAoR/O-oSIHPHIR. 23:VANLALHRUAII oD/O-oPHIRTHANGAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 24:NGAIHSAKI oD/O-oLALENGLIANAoR/O-oARMEDoVENGoAIZAWL. 25:KAPHNUNA oS/O-oZAHRUAIAoR/O-oRAMHLUNoAIZAWL. PageoNo.#o3/6 26:K.oSANGTHUAMA oS/O-oPIANGHLEIAoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 27:K.oROKIMA oS/O-oPIANGHLEIAoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 28:AIKHUMI oW/O-oL.oROKHUMAoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 29:C.oHMUAKLIANA oS/O-oZULAWMAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 30:BIAKCHHUNGI oW/O-oK.oTHANMAWIAoR/O-oCHHINGAoVENGoAIZAWL. 31:LALTHAKIMI oD/O-oMAMAoR/O-oRAMTHARoAIZAWL. 32:T.oZAMLIANA oS/O-oHNUNDAILOVAoR/O-oARMEDoVENGoAIZAWL. 33:TLAUTHUAMA oS/O-oTHLAHHLEIAo(L)oR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 34:VUNGCHINA oS/O-oTHANGAoR/O-oARMEDoVENGoAIZAWL. 35:LIANSAWMA oC/O-oK.T.oTHANGIoR/O-oELECTRICoVENGoAIZAWL. 36:K.oZOLIANA oS/O-oTHANCHHUNGAo(L)oR/O-oDINTHARoVENGoAIZAWL. 37:B.oC.oAoCABLES oS/O-oCHHUMAo(L)oR/O-oZARKAWToAIZAWL. 38:B.oC.oAoCABLES oS/O-oCHHUMAo(L)oR/O-oZARKAWToAIZAWL. 39:BIAKCHUNGA oS/O-oCHHUMAo(L)oR/O-oZARKAWToAIZAWL. 40:BIAKCHUNGA oS/O-oCHHUMAo(L)oR/O-oZARKAWToAIZAWL. 41:BIAKCHUNGA oS/O-oCHHUMAo(L)oR/O-oZARKAWToAIZAWL. Page No.# 4/6 42:KAPHNUNI W/O-RUALA PACHUAU (L) R/O-REPUBLIC VENG AIZAWL. 43:F. KHUALLUNA S/O-KAITHANGA R/O-ARMED VENG AIZAWL. 44:PATHUANA ARMED VENG AIZAWL. 45:LALRINSANGA S/O-VANLALRUATA R/O-ARMED VENG AIZAWL. 46:ZARMAWIA S/O-VANTLUANGA R/O-ARMED VENG AIZAWL. 47:THANZAUVA S/O-REMTHANGA R/O-ARMED VENG AIZAWL. 48:MHIP, CHITE BRANCH R/O-CHITE VENG AIZAWL. 49:L. HMANGAIHA R/O-ARMED VENG AIZAWL. 50:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF MIZORAM DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE AND SETTLEMENT GOVT. OF MIZORAM AIZAWL MIZORAM. 51:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLECTOR AIZAWL DISTRICT AIZAWL MIZORAM For the Appellant(s) : Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, Deputy Solicitor General of India. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K.P. Pathak, Advocate for respondent Nos.2, 6 to 17, 20 to 24, 26, 27, 31, 36, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 49 : Ms. P. Bhattacharjee, Additional Advocate General, Mizoram for respondent Nos.50 and 51. Page No.# 5/6 – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

11.12.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

After arguing the matter for quite some time at length, learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents have frankly admitted that the dispute raised before the learned Single Judge regarding the rental compensation to be paid to the private respondents involve several disputed questions of fact and for resolving those disputed questions of fact, a proper adjudication by Civil Court is required. Learned counsel appearing for the private respondents has frankly admitted that the disputed questions of fact involved in this writ appeal can only be resolved by a Civil Court after taking into consideration the evidence adduced by the respective parties. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the impugned judgment and order dated 31.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court (Aizwal Bench) in WP(C) No.89/2017 may be set aside and the private respondents be granted liberty to approach the Civil Court by filing appropriate suit for redressal of their grievances. It is noticed that earlier also the private respondents have approached the Civil Court by way of filing Title Suit No.5/1998. However, the said Title Suit came to be dismissed as withdrawn on the request of the counsel appearing for the private respondents in which liberty was also sought to file a fresh suit, if so advised. In view of above submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ appeal is disposed of. The impugned order dated 31.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Page No.# 6/6 WP(C) No.89/2017 is set aside. However, the private respondents are at liberty to institute a Civil Suit/Title Suit before the competent Civil Court for their entitlement for receiving rental compensation/compensation in respect of the land involved within a period of 4(four) months from today.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.