VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Babur Ali @ Babar v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 February 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 359/2024

Judgment

ORDER

23.02.2024

Heard Mr. J. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. This is an application made under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail by the petitioner, namely, Md. Babur Ali @ Babar, in connection with Numaligarh Page No.# 2/3 Rural PS Case No. 46/2023 registered under Sections 420/409 of IPC read with Section 66(D) of I.T. Act. Case diary as called for is placed before the Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has taken only Rs.15,000/- from the informant for opening customer service Point of Boroda Bank and he is now ready to return the money to the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 13.01.2024 and he has been detained in custody for 41 days and considering his length of detention, bail may be granted to the petitioner. Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has produced the case diary and submitted that the petitioner admitted that he has taken money from the informant for opening customer service Point of Boroda Bank. He further submitted that considering the length of detention, bail may be granted to the petitioner.

After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs. 20,000/-with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Golaghat subject to the following conditions-

(i) That the accused petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required;

(ii) That the accused petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with Page No.# 3/3 the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer or the Court; and

(iii) That the petitioner shall refrain from committing any similar offences in future of which he is accused or suspected of commission. Return the case diary. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010024642024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./359/2024 MD. BABUR ALI @ BABAR S/O MD. HUSSAIN ALI R/O CHAPAI DALGAON P.S. DHULA DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.