Rabia Khatun v. The Union of India and 7 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010024802024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/724/2024o RABIAoKHATUNo W/O-oNAYEBoALI,o D/O-oLATEoABEDoALI,o VILL-oPAKRIGURI,o P.S-oSALBARI,o P.O-oBIJNI,o DIST-oBAKSAo,oBTAD,oASSAM,oPIN-783390 VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo7oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoMINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oGOVT.oOF INDIA,oSASTRIoBHAWAN,oNEWoDELHI-o110001. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6 3:THEoDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER oBAKSA oMUSHALPUR oPIN-783390 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oBAKSA oBTAD oMUSHALPUR oPIN-783390 5:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) Page No.# 2/3 BARPETA PIN-781301 6:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001 7:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS ASSAM HOUSEFED 2ND FLOOR GUWAHATI-32 DIST-KAMRUP (M) 8:THE FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL NO-9 BARPETA

P.O AND DIST-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78130 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI 16/02/2024 (M.R. Pathak, J) Heard Mr. A Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A Verma, learned Standing counsel, Home Department, Assam for the respondent Nos. 2, 4, 5 & 8 and Mr. P Sharma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 3. Mr. Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are some inadvertent mistakes in this writ petition as the petitioner failed to annex certain documents. As such, on instruction of the petitioner, Mr. Roshid, learned counsel prayed for withdrawal of this writ petition seeking a liberty to file afresh. Page No.# 3/3 Considering such submission, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed subject to the condition that as and when the petitioner prefers a fresh writ petition pertaining to the impugned final order dated 02.02.2022 passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal 9th Barpeta, Assam in F.T. 9th

(BPT) Case No. 11/2018 declaring her to be a foreigner under the Foreigners Act, 1946, she shall annex a copy of this order to the said writ petition and shall also make a statement that earlier she preferred a writ petition that was withdrawn with a liberty to file afresh. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. Liberty as prayed for, so granted.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant