VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Baser Miya and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
5 March 2024
Bench
Kaushik Goswamiauthor
Case no.
AB 325/2024

Judgment

ORDER

06.03.2024 Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parashar, learned Addl. P.P, Assam. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.PC, 1973 for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, namely Sh. Baser Miya and Sh. Tajibar Miya, who are apprehending arrest in connection with Manikpur P.S Case No. 12/2024 registered under Section 366 IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the informant lodged an FIR on

25.01.2024 alleging that on 23.01.2024, the FIR mentioned accused persons being the present petitioners' herein, elopped his younger sister from his house without their knowledge and kept her confined in their house. Accordingly, a case was registered. Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the meantime, the victim, i.e. Nalbanu Khatun, who is a major, has married the petitioner No. 1. Mr. K.K. Parashar, learned Addl. P.P, Assam submits on the basis of the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC that she admits that she was in love with the petitioner No. 1 and accordingly elopped with him, since her family was trying to get her married to someone else. She further admits in her aforesaid statement that she has now married to the petitioner No. 1. Page No.# 3/3 I have heard the submissions made at the bar and have perused the materials available on record. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the petitioners named above shall be released on pre-arrest bail in connection with the above noted case on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/-with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) That the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer. With the above observation and direction, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Return the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010025982024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/325/2024o BASERoMIYAoANDoANR.o R/OoVILL-oSPUARIGUR,o P.S.oMANIKPURo DIST.oBONGAIGAON,oASSAMo PIN-783392 2:oTAJIBARoMIYA oS/OoJIROLoMIYAo VILL-oSUPARIGURIo P.S.oMANIKPURo DIST.oBONGAIGAON oASSAMo PIN-78339o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oSoAHMEDo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.