VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Abdullah Sheikh v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 February 2024
Bench
S. Justice Mitali Thakuriaauthor
Case no.
AB 326/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 23 .02. 2024 Heard Mr. AY Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. KK Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioner, Abdullah Sheikh, praying for pre-arrest bail, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Dispur P.S. Case Page No.# 2/3 No. 2362/2023 under Section 366 IPC. Case diary is received and perused. Also perused the materials on record and the annexures appended threto. Heard both sides. It is submitted by Mr. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitioner that family of the victim and the petitioner are residing in the same campus and the petitioner is working as labourer and on the alleged date of incident, the victim went to visit her relatives' house and the petitioner only helped her for going to her relatives' house and he has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. However, the victim has already been recovered and her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has already been recorded and there is a village Bichar wherein the matter was amicably settled on compromise. He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the I.O., if the privilege of pre-arrest bail is granted to him. In this context, Mr. Das, the learned Addl. PP has submitted that the victim has already been recovered and her statement under Section 164 has also been recorded wherein she has stated that she went to the petitioner at her own volition. However, there are materials available in the case diary as the victim is still minor. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials available in the case diary as well as in the record and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the benefit of pre-arrest bail may be extended to the petitioner. Accordingly it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforementioned case, the petitioner be released on pre-arrest bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/-with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the following conditions that:-

¶1the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. within 7 days from today.

¶2the petitioner shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required; Page No.# 3/3

¶3the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any other police officer, and

¶4the petitioner shall not hamper the investigation or temper with the evidence of the case. Return the case diary. In terms of the above direction, the bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010027292024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/326/2024 ABDULLAH SHEIKH S/O HARAN ALI JURIPAR (NEAR BYLANE 20) PANJABARI, SIXMILE, ASSAM P.O. DISPUR, PIN-781037 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.