VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Robin Gogoi v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
17 February 2023
Bench
Kalyan Rai Suranaauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 464/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 17.02.2023

Heard Mr. P.P. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, learned APP appearing for the State. The petitioner, who was arrested on 19.12.2022, is seeking regular bail Page No.# 2/3 under section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with Jonai P.S. Case No. 131/2022 under sections 120(B) IPC read with Section 21(b)/29 of NDPS Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 19.12.2022 and today is the 60th day from the date of his remand. Accordingly, the learned APP was requested to contact the I.O. of the case to ascertain as to whether charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Upon instruction, the learned APP has submitted that till date charge-sheet has not been submitted in connection with the aforesaid case. In this case the petitioner is accused of offence under Section 120(B) IPC read with Section 21(b)/29 NDPS Act. For the substantive offence committed under Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act, as per the provision of Section 36A of the NDPS Act read with Section 167(2) CrPC, the default bail period would be 60 days. Accordingly, in view of the said provision under Section 36A of the NDPS Act read with Section 167(2) CrPC, the Court is inclined to grant default bail to the petitioner, namely, Robin Gogoi in connection with the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two suitable sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Dhemaji. The bail is granted on the following conditions:

¶1The petitioner shall make himself available to the police or any other investigating agency or Court in the present case as and when required.

¶2The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case Page No.# 3/3 so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. He shall not, in any manner, try to overawe or influence or intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶3The petitioner shall not obstruct the smooth progress of the investigation/trial.

¶4The petitioner shall not misuse his liberty in any manner.

¶5The petitioner shall appear before the I/O within 10 (ten) days from the date of his release, and continue to appear once every 15(fifteen) days till his appearance is dispensed with or charge-sheet is submitted, whichever is earlier. The grant of bail to the petitioner would not be an impediment to the I.O. to take necessary steps as may be permitted in accordance with law. This application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010027992023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./464/2023 ROBIN GOGOI S/O- PURNAKANTA GOGOI, R/O- AGAM DOLUNG, P.O AND P.S- JONAI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.