- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 19 March 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- AB 395/2024
Judgment
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028692024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/395/2024 NAJUK UDDIN LASKAR S/O LATE RAHIM UDDIN LASKAR R/O VILL-DHAMALI, P.O. DAKSHIN KRISHNAPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F Z MAZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
20.03.2024
Heard Mr. F.Z. Mazumder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Page No.# 2/3 1973 for seeking pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, namely, Najuk Uddin Laskar, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Karimganj P.S. Case No. 28/2024 under Sections 419/420/376/313 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
¶3The case diary as called for is placed before this Court.
¶4It may be mentioned that vide order dated 20.02.2024, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.
¶5Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. submits that the case diary shows that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has got his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C, as per the interim pre-arrest bail granted earlier. He further submits that there are no materials adverse at this stage collected against the petitioner by the Investigating Officer. He further submits that the petitioner is co-operating with the investigation.
¶6In view of the above, this Court finds that custodial interrogation may not be required in the interest of the ongoing investigation into the case. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order dated 20.02.2024 is hereby made absolute subject to the following conditions,
i) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation,
ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.
¶7This disposes of the anticipatory bail application. Page No.# 3/3 Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.