VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

M/S Shyam Sunder Mukesh Kumar v. North East Frontier Railway and 7 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
16 February 2024
Bench
Michael Zothankhumaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 755/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 17.02.2024

Heard Mr. R. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the respondents not taking a decision on the petitioner's representations, for extending the free delivery period of the coaches purchased by the petitioner through E-Auction Sale.

¶2The petitioner's counsel submits that pursuant to the E-Auction Sale dated

23.09.2023, the petitioner purchased (7) condemned broad-gauge (BG) coaches of the North East Frontier Railway on 23.09.2023. The petitioner was thereafter given a sale release order dated 06.10.2023 on payment of the balance sales value for the (7) condemned coaches that he had bought. However, due to the

(7) condemned coaches being located near the main railway station, the Page No.# 3/4 petitioner requested the Railway Authority to relocate the coaches to a more suitable place, to enable the petitioner to cut the coaches and take away the cut parts safely, in the interest of safety of the public. However, the petitioner's request was rejected by the respondents on 03.11.2023.

¶3The respondents thereafter fixed 06.11.2023 as the date for handing-over the site of the location of the (7) condemned coaches for cutting and delivery, vide letter dated 04.11.2023 issued by the respondents. In the said letter dated

04.11.2023, 10.11.2023 and 11.11.2023 were given as the last dates for the petitioner to take delivery of the cut pieces of the (7) condemned BG coaches.

¶4The petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner prayed for being given an extended period, for delivery of the cut coaches, as they were given only 4/5 days for delivery of the cut coaches, vide letter dated 04.11.2023. He submits that though the petitioner has completed the task of cutting the coaches and the same are ready for delivery by the petitioner, the petitioner has not been able to take delivery of the cut pieces of the coaches, as the delivery period has expired. Further, the respondents have not taken a decision on the petitioner's representations for extending the free delivery period.

¶5The petitioner's counsel submits that this writ petition can be disposed of, if a direction is issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 6 to take a decision on the petitioner's representations dated 08.11.2023, 14.11.2023, 16.11.2023 and

08.01.2024, regarding the request for extending the free delivery period within a specific time frame.

¶6Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Railways submits that he has got no objection to the prayer made by the petitioner's counsel.

¶7In view of the consent of the parties, this writ petition is disposed of, with Page No.# 4/4 a direction to the respondent Nos. 3 & 6 to take a decision on the petitioner's representations dated 08.11.2023, 14.11.2023, 16.11.2023 and 08.01.2024, within a period of 3 (three) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010029212024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/755/2024o M/SoSHYAMoSUNDERoMUKESHoKUMARo AoPARTNERSHIPoFIRMoREP.oBYoITSoPARTNERoSRIoMUKESHoKUMARo SHARMA,oAGEDoABOUTo48oYRS,oHAVINGoITSoREGDoOFFICEoAToESSo COMPLEX,oSJoROAD,oATHGAON,oGUWAHATI,oASSAM,oPIN-781008,oALSOoATo JYOTIKUCHI,oLOKHRAoROAD,oGUWAHATI-40,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM VERSUSo NORTHoEASToFRONTIERoRAILWAYoANDo7oORSo MALIGAON,oGUWAHATI.o REP.oBYoITSoGENERALoMANAGER,oNFoRAILWAYo,oHEADQUARTER,o MALIGAON,oGUWAHATI-11 2:THEoCONTROLLERoOFoSTORE oNFoRAILWAYo oHEADQUARTER oMALIGAONoGUWAHATI-11 oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 3:THEoPRINCIPALoCHIEFoMATERIALoMANAGER oNFoRAILWAYo oHEADQUARTER oMALIGAON oGUWAHATI-11 oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 4:THEoDEPUTYoCHIEFoMATERIALoMANAGER oNFoRAILWAYo oHEADQUARTER oMALIGAONoGUWAHATI-11 oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM Page No.# 2/4 5:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER RANGIA DISTT.-KAMRUP ASSAM 6:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MATERIAL MANAGER RANGIA DISTT- KAMRUP ASSAM 7:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEER RANGIA DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 8:THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER C AND W IC RPAN NF RAILWAY RANGAPARA NORTH ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N PATIRI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.