VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. The Union of India and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
20 March 2023
Bench
Sanjay Kumar Medhiauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 1081/2022

Judgment

ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard Shri G. N. Sahewalla, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S. C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, GST. One of the issue involved in this writ petition is whether the units who had utilized the CENVAT credit for the purpose of payment of taxes with reference to the exemption notification dated 25.04.2007 (Annexure-V), but the stage to pay the taxes by cash after exhausting the CENVAT credit was yet to come, can be construed that the units have availed the benefit under the notification dated 25.04.2007, with reference to the subsequent scheme dated 05.10.2017. If the conclusion would have been that this category of units had availed the benefit under the notification dated

25.04.2007, the implication thereof would be that there would be an entitlement to the benefits as provided under the budgetary scheme dated 05.10.2017 and to the contrary, had the decision been otherwise that they are not the units who have availed the benefits, the consequence may be that they would not be entitled to the benefits under the budgetary scheme dated 05.10.2017. A communication dated 22.02.2023 from the Government of India, Ministry of Page No.# 3/3 Commerce and Industry, Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade made by the Director and addressed to the Commissioner, CBIC, D/o Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi is placed on record before the Court. A reading of the said communication dated 22.02.2023 makes it discernible that a decision had been taken that even in respect of those units who had paid their tax dues pursuant to the earlier exemption notification dated 25.04.2007 by utilizing the CENVAT credit, but the stage to pay the further taxes by means of cash was yet to come, would be considered by the authorities to be units who have availed the benefits under the earlier exemption notification dated 25.04.2007. As the decision contained in the communication dated 22.02.2023 answers the issue that was before the Court that such units should also be considered to be units who have availed the benefits under the exemption notification dated 25.04.2007, we are of the view that, having accepted the contents of the communication dated

22.02.2023, no further adjudication is required in the writ petition. The consequence of such units being considered to be units who have availed the benefits under the exemption notification dated 25.04.2007 would be that such units, including the writ petitioner herein, would be entitled to all such entitlements, legal consequences etc of being considered to be units who have availed the benefits under the exemption notification dated 25.04.2007 and the respondent authorities may do the needful accordingly. In view of the above, the writ petition stand closed. However, liberty is granted to the writ petitioner to approach again, if so advised. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. A copy of the communication dated 22.02.2023 is kept on record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010029252022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1081/2022o HINDUSTANoUNILEVERoLTDo AoCOMPANYoINCORPORATEDoUNDERoTHEoINDIANoCOMPANIESoACT,o1913o ANDoHAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToUNILEVERoHOUSE,oBoDo SAWANToMARG,oCHAKALA,oANDHERIo(EAST)oMUMBAI-400099oAMDoITSo PERSONALoPRODUCTSoFACTORYo(UNIToIV)o AToDOOMDOOMAoINDUSTRIALoESTATE,oDIST.oTINSUKIA,oASSAM-786151,o REP.oTHROUGHoITSoCONSTITUTEDoATTORNEYoANDoAUTHORISEDo SIGNAORYoHRISHIKESHoRAMANI,oS/OoDR.oR.oRAMANI. VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIAoMINISTRYoOFoFINANCE, DEPARTMENToOFoREVENUE,oNORTHoBLOCK,oNEWoDELHI. 2:SECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA oMINISTRYoOFoCOMMERCEoANDoINDUSTRY oDEPARTMENToOFoINDUSTRIESoPOLICYoANDoPROMOTION oUDYOGoBHAWAN oNEWoDELHI-110107. 3:THEoJOINToSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oMINISTRYoOFoCOMMERCEoANDoINDUSTRY oDEPARTMENToOFoINDUSTRIALoPOLICYoANDoPROMOTION oUDYOGoBHAWAN oNEWoDELHI-110107. 4:THEoUNDERoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA oMINISTRYoOFoFINANCE oDEPARTMENToOFoREVENUE oNORTHoBLOCK,ooNEWoDELHI-110001. 5:THEoCOMMISSIONERoOFoCENTRALoEXCISEoANDoSERVICEoTAX oGSToBHAWAN Page No.# 2/3 KEDAR ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 6:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI DIVISION-I GST BHAWAN KEDAR ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G N SAHEWALLA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.