- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 February 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 142/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15-02-2024 Heard both the sides. The learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. A. Borah has prayed for condonation in preferring the criminal revision petition against the impugned order dated 23.08.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, Bongaigaon in Page No.# 2/2 connection with Manikpur Police Station Case No. 108/2023 rejecting the zimma of the E-Rickshaw seized in connection with this case. Heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State. It is submitted that that applicant had prayed for certified copy of the impugned order in the month of November, 2023, which were received by the applicant on 14.12.2023. There appears to be sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Delay is hereby condoned. This interlocutory application is disposed of. The Registry is directed to register the connected criminal revision petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010029352024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/142/2024 NIJAM UDDIN @ NIJAM UDDIN ALI S/O RAJJAK ALI R/O VILL- PURAN BIJNI P.S. BIJNI DIST. CHIRANG, PIN-783390 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.