- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 February 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 355/2024
Judgment
ORDER
16.02.2024 Heard Mr U K Barman, learned counsel for the petitioner, Hafiz Islam @ Hafizul Islam.
¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for Page No.# 2/2 pre-arrest bail, as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Fatasil Ambari PS Case No. 45/2024, under Sections 294/354(C)/509/506 IPC, read with Section 67(A) of the IT Act, 2000.
¶3Heard Mr R R Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the offences under which the petitioner is booked are bailable offences, so this petition under Section 438 CrPC is not maintainable.
¶5As there appears to be no apprehension of arrest, petition is not considered and the matter is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010029422024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/355/2024 HAFIZ ISLAM @ HAFIZUL ISLAM S/O MAFIJUL ISLAM R/O MASJID PATH, DHIRENPARA, P.S. FATASIL AMBARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.