VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Faizur Rahman v. Kushal Dowari and 2 Ors

Disposed On Motion date after hearing the Petitioner
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 February 2024
Bench
Lanusungkum Jamirauthor
Case no.
Cont.Cas(C) 93/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 23.02.2024

Heard Mr. S. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the directions passed by this Court in WP(C)/4440/2021 by order dated 25.08.2023. The relevant portion of the order dated 25.08.2023 reads as under:

"7. Under such circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that this writ petition can be closed since the prayer made by the petitioner has been considered favorably by the department as is reflected by the minutes of Board Directors meeting held on the

19.10.2022.

¶8In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands closed. It is expected that the Board of Directors will issue necessary promotional orders in pursuance to the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors in favour of the petitioner as has been done in the case of the other similarly situated persons and any other grievance, which the petitioner may have in respect of release of arrear or in respect of giving it effect or in respect of seniority etc. can be addressed to the respondent authorities upon such representation filed by the petitioner.

¶9In terms of the above observations the petitions stands closed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner.

¶10The writ petition stands disposed of."

A perusal of the directions would indicate that no time limit has been fixed by this Court. Accordingly this Contempt Petition is disposed of directing the Page No.# 3/3 respondents to comply with the directions passed by this Court by the order dated 25.08.2023 in WP(C)/4440/2021 within a period of 1(one) month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order of this Court. With the above observations and directions, this Contempt Petition is closed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010031102024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCont.Cas(C)/93/2024o MD.oFAIZURoRAHMANo S/O-oLATEoABADULLAH,oINoCHARGEoACCOUNTSoOFFICER,oASSAMoURBAN WATERoSUPPLYoANDoSEWERAGEoBOARD,oDIBRUGARHoDIVISION,oASSAM- 786001. VERSUSo KUSHALoDOWARIoANDo2oORS.o CHAIRMAN,oASSAMoURBANoWATERoSUPPLYoANDoSEWERGEoBOARD,oR.G.o BARUAHoROAD,oGANESHGURI,o781005,oASSAM 2:PRANATIoGOGOI oTHEoMANAGINGoDIRECTOR oASSAMoURBANoWATERoSUPPLYoANDoSEWERAGEoBOARD oR.G.oBARUAHoROAD oGANESHGURI o781005 oASSAM 3:DHIRAJoSAIKIA oTHEoCHIEFoENGINEER oASSAMoURBANoWATERoSUPPLYoANDoSEWERAGEoBOARD oR.G.oBARUAHoROAD oGANESHGURI o781005 oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoSoCHOUDHURYo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.