- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 22 October 2024
- Bench
- Michael Zothankhuma
- Case no.
- WP(C) 850/2023
Judgment
ORDER
23.10.2024 Heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. R. Deka, learned counsel for the Water Resources Department. Also heard Ms. P. Soren, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.
¶2The petitioner's case is that the petitioner participated in the tender process floated by the Water Resources Department, vide NIT dated
20.12.2022, for the work "Immediate measures for restoration of Balbala Marginal Bund at different reaches in between ch 400m and ch 150m L/B of river Jinari under SDRF for the year 2021-22."
¶3The petitioner's technical bid was disqualified and the respondent No.3 was allotted the contract work on 15.02.2023. The petitioner has challenged the disqualification of his technical bid and has also challenged the credentials of the respondent No.3 to be allotted the contract work.
¶4Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been given any up-to-date instructions by his client as on date.
¶5On the other hand, Ms. R. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the Water Resources Department submits that the work contract allotted to the Page No.# 3/3 respondent No.3 has been completed by the respondent No.3, as there was no stay order passed by this Court.
¶6In view of the submission made by Ms. R. Deka, the learned counsel for the Water Resources Department, it appears that the writ petition has become infructuous.
¶7Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010031142023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/850/2023o JYOTIRMOYoKALITAo S/O.oLT.oJOGENoKALITA,oR/O.oHOUSEoNO.37,oNEARoNABAJYOTIoGASo AGENCY,oHATIGARHoCHARIALI,oZOOoNARENGIoROAD,oGUWAHATI,oDIST.o KAMRUPo(M),oASSAM,oPIN-781024. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoADDL.oCHIEFoSECRETARY,oWATERoRESOURCEoDEPTT.,o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI-781006. 2:CHIEFoENGINEER oWATERoRESOURCEoDEPT. oBASISITHA oGUWAHATI oPIN-781029. 3:S.S.oENGINEERS oPROPRIETOR oMR.oSUMANoGOGOI oMANDIRoPATH oHOUSEoNO.36 oJAYAoNAGAR oKHANAPARA oP.S.oDISPUR oGUWAHATI oPIN-781022o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oBoCHAKRABORTY,oMRSoPoHAZARIKAo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE, MS M ZOMUANPUII,MR J SINGH (R- 3),MR P DOLEY (R-3),MR H AGARWAL (R-3),MR. R KALITA (R-3),MR. B D KONWAR SR. ADV. (R-3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.