VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jintu Gogoi and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
7 August 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
AB 472/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 08.08.2024

Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.P.Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. By filing this application under Section 438 CrPC, the petitioners, namely,

(1) Jintu Gogoi and (2) Lakhshi Saikia who are apprehending arrest in connection with Jorhat P.S. case no. 23/2023 under section 379 of the IPC read with section 3 of PDPP Act and section 23 of Petroleum Act, 1934, are seeking pre-arrest bail. The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court. It may be mentioned that by order, dated 17.02.2023, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Mr. B.Sharma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary shows that the petitioners appeared before the investigating officer and got their statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as per the interim pre arrest bail granted earlier. There is no adverse report against the petitioners from the I.O. Therefore, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 17.02.2023 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions-

(i) That the petitioners shall co-operate in investigation as and Page No.# 3/3 when required;

(ii) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and

(iii) That the petitioners shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner. Return the case diary. This disposes of the anticipatory bail application.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010031792023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/472/2023o JINTUoGOGOIoANDoANR.o S/OoSRIoKOILASHoCH.oGOGOIo R/OoJHANJIoLEPHERAGAONo(NEARoJHANJIoLEPHERAoL.P.oSCHOOL)o P.O.oJHANJIo MOUZA-oMORAoBAZARo P.S.oGAURISAGARo DIST.oSIVASAGAR,oASSAM 2:oSRIoLAKSHIoSAIKIA oS/OoLATEoNOBINoSAIKIAo R/OoJHANJIoBORUAHo GAON o P.O.oJHANIo MOUZA-oMORAoBAZARo P.S.oGAURISAGARo DIST.oSIVASAGAR oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oAoBHATTACHARYYA,o AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.