- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 23 July 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- Crl.Rev.P. 52/2020
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010032032020 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCrl.Rev.P./52/2020o KRIPESWARoROYo S/OoLATEoKANAKENDUoROY,oR/OoG.C.oCOLLEGEoROAD,oP.O.-SILCHAR,oP.S.- SILCHAR,oDIST-CACHAR,oASSAM,oPIN-788004 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR,oASSAM 2:SAMIRoSINHA oS/OoLATEoSUBIRoSINHA oR/OoCHENCOORIEoROADo(MADHYASREEoLANE) oP.O.-AMBICAPATTY oSILCHAR-4 oP.S.-SILCHAR oDIST-CACHAR oASSAM oPIN-78800o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oNoUDDINo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 24/07/2024 Heard Mr. M Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent No. 1 and Mr. T Sheikh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. Both Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sheikh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2/complainant submitted that the petitioner expired on 22.01.2024. In view of the above, this criminal revision petition, being infructuous, stands dismissed. The interim order passed earlier on 24.02.2020 accordingly stands vacated. Registry shall return the records of the Crl. A. No. 15/2018 to the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Cachar, Silchar forthwith along with a copy of this order.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.