- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 18 April 2024
- Bench
- Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- AB 399/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 19.04.2024 Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who has produced the case diary of Pragjyotishpur P.S. Case No. 158/2017. However, he has submitted that the case diary is updated only upto 28.02.2024. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Page No.# 2/2 the petitioner, namely, Sueda Mabia Khatun was allowed to go on interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 20.02.2024 and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and hence, has cooperated with the investigation. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 20.02.2024 is hereby made absolute with the conditions (i), (ii) & (iii) attached to the said order remain intact. With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010034122024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/399/2024 SUEDA MABIA KHATUN D/O MD. MANSUR ALI PROPRIETOR OF M/S MABIA ENTERPRISE, R/O VILL- NO. 2, KHARGHULI, AMGAON, P.S. PRAGJYOTISHPUR GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.