VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ashim Adhikari v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
27 March 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 475/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 28.03.2024

Heard Mr. A. Hawari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application made under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail by the petitioner, namely, Ashim Adhikari, in connection with Kamalpur P.S. Page No.# 2/3 Case No. 198/2023, registered under Section 120(B)/121(A) IPC r/w Section 10/13 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Added Section 121 of IPC. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was arrested on 29.12.2023 and since then he has been detained in jail hazot. In the meantime, he has completed mandatory period of 90 days in jail hazot and charge-sheet has not yet been submitted. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for default bail. Mr. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the case diary has been received and the charge-sheet has not yet been submitted in this case. There is no any prayer by the investigating officer requiring extension of time for further detention of the petitioner. I have considered the submissions made by the parties. I have perused the case diary. As it appears that the petitioner has been detained in custody for more than 90 days and charge-sheet has not yet been submitted and there is no prayer by investigating officer requiring further detention of the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Kamalpur P.S. Case No. 198/2023, registered under Section 120(B)/121(A) IPC r/w Section 10/13 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Added Section 121 of IPC, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Rangiya, Kamrup, Assam. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner: Page No.# 3/3

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned SDJM, Rangiya, Kamrup, Assam without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. Send back the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010034172024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./475/2024 ASHIM ADHIKARI S/O SATISH CHANDRA ADHIKARI R/O ADABARI COLONY, PANDU, RAILWAY QUARTER NO. L1-40A, P.S. JALUKBARI DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A HAWARI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.