Kanhaiya Yadav v. The State of Assam and 4 Ors

ORDER Date : 02.08.2024

Mr. B. P. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the stand taken by the respondents in the affidavit, the petitioner would not like to proceed with the instant writ petition. He however, submits that he may be given the liberty to submit a representation before the concerned District Commissioner if the building of the petitioner which was demolished was standing on Dag No. 297 and thereupon claim compensation.

¶2The writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. It is however observed that withdrawal of the writ petition shall not act as a bar to the petitioner to submit representation before the District Commissioner seeking compensation, if permissible under law.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010034482023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1038/2023o KANHAIYAoYADAVo S/O-oLT.oCHURAMANoSINGH,oR/O-oVILL-oNO.o2oNAZIRATING,oP.O.o NAZIRATING,oP.S.oDIGBOI,oDIST.-oTINSUKIA,oASSAM,oPIN-o786171 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoCOMM.oANDoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oREVENUEo DEPTT.,oDISPUR,oGHY-6 2:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oTINSUKIA oDIST.-oTINSUKIA oASSAM oPIN-o786171 3:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICER oTINSUKIAoREVENUEoCIRCLE oDIST.-oTINSUKIA oASSAM oPIN-o786171 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE oTINSUKIA oDIST.-oTINSUKIA oPIN-o786171 5:SRIoSURENoPHUKAN oMEMBERoOFoLEGISLATIVEoASSEMBLYoDIGBOIoLAC oR/O-oNO.o1oAXOMIYAoGAON oTINGRAIoBAZAR oOPP.oTINGRAIoRKBoHIGHoSCHOOL Page No.# 2/2 DIST.- TINSUKIA PIN- 78617 Advocate for the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. P. Borah Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. B.J. Talukdar Mr. N. Bordoloi BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH