VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ashraful Hoque and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
10 March 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 483/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 11-03-2024 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. MP Goswami, learned APP. The petitioners, namely, (1) Ashraful Hoque, (2) Sahidul Rahman, (3) Latiful Hoque and (4) Ariful Islam who were arrested on 12.02.2024 in connection with Basistha PS case no.91/2024 under sections 120(B)/379 IPC read with section 11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Acts and sections 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act are seeking regular bail by filing this application under section 439 Cr.P.C. Case diary is received. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no.1 is the driver of the XUV bearing no.AS-01-FV-2068 and the petitioner no.2 is the driver of the truck bearing no.AS-17-B-2565 from which the cattle was recovered. It is also submitted that pre-arrest bail was granted to the owner of the truck by this Court and the owner of the XUV was arrested. The petitioner nos.3 and 4 are the helpers in the truck. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that more than 28 Page No.# 3/3 days they were in custody and under the facts and circumstances of the case, their further custodial interrogation may not be required in this case. The learned APP submits that considering the length of detention of the petitioners, prayer for bail may be considered. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties as well as the length of detention, the Court is inclined to release the petitioners, named above, on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- each (Rupees twenty thousand only) with one suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused petitioners:

(1) Shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned CJM, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati without prior written permission from him/ her.

(2) Shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. Case diary be returned back. Bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010034872024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./483/2024o ASHRAFULoHOQUEoANDo3oORS.o S/OoABDULoMAZIDo R/OoVILL-oKHUDIMARI,oGAURIPURo PART-I,oP.S.oGAURIPUR,oDIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAM 2:oSAHIDULoRAHMAN oS/OoAZGARoALIo R/OoVILL-oKHUDIMARI oGAURIPURoPART-I oP.S.oGAURIPUR o DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 3:oLATIFULoHOQUE oS/OoABDULoAZIDo R/OoVILL-oKHUDIMARI oGAURIPURoPART- oP.S.oGAURIPUR oDIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 4:oARIFULoISLAM oS/OoGIRAJULoISLAMo R/OoVILL-oJEUMARI oP.S.oRUPOHIHAT o DIST.oNAGAON oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.